Citation: | HUANG Zhe. Development and field test of probe-type intelligent bit parameter measurement device [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(4):34-43. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2024004 |
The existing measuring device installed on the upside of current PDM motor fails to get the real data at the bit position, and the intelligent drilling suffers from serious data biases and unpredictable implementation risks at decision-making and control level. Therefore, a probe-type intelligent bit parameter measurement device was developed, which could be installed inside the bit and collect the real data of the bit without any change on the existing bottom hole assembly (BHA) and operating process. The hardware structure simulation optimization of the device was performed, and the theoretical hydraulic pressure loss was less than 0.1 MPa with a safety factor of 3.06 under the displacement of 30 L/s and annular pressure of 80 MPa. The error calibration and noise reduction of this device were achieved by six-sided method measurement together with auto regressive moving average (ARMA) model and moving Kalman filter. Field trials of the device have been conducted in 9 wells in Shengli Oilfield. The function of the device was verified, and the downhole data was compared based on the downhole engineering parameter measurement sub. The speed-up analysis and parameter optimization of the pilot wells were carried out through integrating the comprehensive logging data. The test results show that the probe-type intelligent bit parameter measurement device can collect the real data of the bit position, which can provide a reliable basis for the speed-up and efficiency improvement analysis and drilling parameter optimization.
[1] |
Baker Hughes. MultiSense dynamics mapping system[EB/OL]. [2023-01-20].https://www.bakerhughes.com/drilling/drilling-optimization-services/multisense-dynamics-mapping-system.
|
[2] |
Halliburton. Cerebro® in-bit sensing[EB/OL]. [2023-01-20].https://www.halliburton.com/en/products/cerebro-bit-sensor-package.
|
[3] |
NOV. BlackBox eclipse II tool[EB/OL]. [2023-01-20].https://www.nov.com/products/blackbox-eclipse-ii-tool.
|
[4] |
LEDGERWOOD III L W, JAIN J R, HOFFMANN O J, et al. Downhole measurement and monitoring lead to an enhanced understanding of drilling vibrations and polycrystalline diamond compact bit damage[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2013, 28(3): 254–262.
|
[5] |
CORNEL S, VAZQUEZ G. Use of big data and machine learning to optimise operational performance and drill bit design[R]. SPE 202243, 2020.
|
[6] |
PELFRENE G, CUILIER B, EZZEDDINE D, et al. Setting a new standard: PDC bits equipped with compact vibration recorders monitor entire run and reveal stick-slip mitigation system dysfunction and downhole motor under performance[R]. SPE 204112, 2021.
|
[7] |
TOWNSEND T, MOSS W, HEINISCH D, et al. Advanced high frequency in-bit vibration measurement including independent, spatially separated sensors for proper resolution of vibration components including lateral, radial, and tangential acceleration[R]. SPE 208110, 2021.
|
[8] |
XIAO Y, QIU H, BUTT S D. Measurement and analysis of drill-bit motions: a case study for passive-vibration assisted rotary drilling (pVARD) tool[R]. ARMA-2020-2036, 2020.
|
[9] |
SUGIURA J, JONES S. A drill bit and a drilling motor with embedded high-frequency (1600 Hz) drilling dynamics sensors provide new insights into challenging downhole drilling conditions[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2019, 34(3): 223–247.
|
[10] |
CHEN Shilin, WISINGER J, DUNBAR B, et al. Identification and mitigation of friction- and cutting-action-induced stick/slip vibrations with PDC bits[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2020, 35(4): 576–587.
|
[11] |
李根生, 宋先知, 田守嶒. 智能钻井技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(1):1–8.
LI Gensheng, SONG Xianzhi, TIAN Shouceng. Intelligent drilling technology research status and development trends[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(1): 1–8.
|
[12] |
黄哲. 面向油气钻井振动测量的空间三轴加速度传感器阵列研究[J]. 电子测量技术,2021,44(8):155–160.
HUANG Zhe. Method of drilling vibration measurement based on spatial array of accelerometers[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2021, 44(8): 155–160.
|
[13] |
HUANG Zhe, YAN Xiuliang, DAI Yanan. Vibration control in optimized drilling and key issues to be applied in new clean geo-energy exploitation[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Green Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (GEESD2022). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2022: 38-48.
|
[14] |
CHEN Xiwu, HUANG Zhe. Novel tool of in-bit measurement for new clean geo-energy exploitation[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Green Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (GEESD2022). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2022: 1223-1232.
|
[15] |
黄哲,吴仲华,李成,等. 智能钻头技术研究与应用探索[J]. 石油机械,2023,51(10):67–76.
HUANG Zhe, WU Zhonghua, LI Cheng, et al. Research and application of intelligent bit technology[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2023, 51(10): 67–76.
|
1. |
刘承诚. 基于KPI的裸眼封隔器应用效能评价. 石油矿场机械. 2025(01): 19-23 .
![]() | |
2. |
丁士东,庞伟,周珺,杨德锴,何同. 顺北油气田超深井分段完井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2024(02): 66-71 .
![]() | |
3. |
黄梁帅. 超深强底水断溶体油藏精细注水技术优化. 粘接. 2024(08): 126-129 .
![]() | |
4. |
王龙,万小勇,林仁奎,李冬梅,徐燕东,朱苏阳. 断控型缝洞气藏酸压规模与无阻流量的关系研究. 钻采工艺. 2024(05): 172-178 .
![]() | |
5. |
蔡计光,王川,房好青,苟波,王琨,任冀川. 全缝长酸蚀填砂裂缝导流能力评价方法. 石油钻探技术. 2023(01): 78-85 .
![]() | |
6. |
耿宇迪,蒋廷学,刘志远,罗志锋,王汉青. 深层缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层水力裂缝扩展机理研究. 石油钻探技术. 2023(02): 81-89 .
![]() | |
7. |
王支柱,汪文星. 酸压技术在伊拉克X油田的应用研究. 天津科技. 2023(05): 26-29 .
![]() | |
8. |
宋周成,段永贤,何思龙,汪鑫,李伟,陈毅,徐国伟,刘浩. 富满油田超深碳酸盐岩酸压液体体系优化组合及应用. 钻采工艺. 2023(02): 139-145 .
![]() | |
9. |
考佳玮,金衍,韦世明. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层人工裂缝扩展数值模拟. 石油科学通报. 2023(03): 303-317 .
![]() | |
10. |
杨兆中,彭擎东,王振普,李小刚,朱静怡,秦杨. 微胶囊固体酸酸化压裂技术应用及展望. 特种油气藏. 2023(03): 1-8 .
![]() | |
11. |
时贤,葛晓鑫,张燕明,黄维安,战永平,古永红,牟春国. 致密白云岩储层加砂压裂裂缝导流能力实验研究. 油气地质与采收率. 2023(04): 167-172 .
![]() | |
12. |
史文洋,杨志豪,朱庆杰,陶磊,白佳佳. 双分支断溶体储层合采水平井压力响应特征. 常州大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 40-52 .
![]() | |
13. |
林永茂,缪尉杰,刘林,李永明,邱玲. 川西南靖和1井茅口组立体酸压技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(02): 105-112 .
![]() | |
14. |
刘芳慧,张世昆,曹耐. 强渗透缓速酸液体系研究与评价. 钻井液与完井液. 2022(03): 365-372 .
![]() | |
15. |
纪成,何天舒,赵兵,罗志锋,陈翔. 纤维强化凝胶合成与性能评价. 钻井液与完井液. 2022(04): 495-500 .
![]() | |
16. |
王辉. 洗象池群改造工艺研究与应用. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2022(06): 13-15 .
![]() | |
17. |
路保平. 中国石化石油工程技术新进展与发展建议. 石油钻探技术. 2021(01): 1-10 .
![]() | |
18. |
曾庆辉,何东博,朱大伟,崔明月,陈彦东,张鹏. 哈法亚油田孔隙性石灰岩储层酸压先导性试验. 石油钻采工艺. 2021(02): 226-232 .
![]() | |
19. |
王伟峰,杨浩,冯青,寇双燕,黄子俊. 深穿透解堵技术适应性油藏数值模拟研究. 石油化工应用. 2021(05): 11-17 .
![]() | |
20. |
王栋. 酸压用咪唑啉缓蚀剂的合成及性能研究. 化学反应工程与工艺. 2021(01): 65-72 .
![]() | |
21. |
齐宁,陈国彬,李振亮,梁冲,何龙. 基于分步算法的裂缝性碳酸盐岩油藏大尺度酸化数值模拟. 石油学报. 2020(03): 348-362+371 .
![]() | |
22. |
罗明良,巩锦程,战永平,司晓冬,罗帅,李钦朋. 环境友好型交联酸的性能及其反应动力学. 精细化工. 2020(04): 834-840 .
![]() | |
23. |
李春月,房好青,牟建业,黄燕飞,胡文庭. 碳酸盐岩储层缝内暂堵转向压裂实验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 88-92 .
![]() | |
24. |
安娜,罗攀登,李永寿,方裕燕,焦克波. 碳酸盐岩储层深度酸压用固体颗粒酸的研制. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 93-97 .
![]() | |
25. |
李双贵,于洋,樊艳芳,曾德智. 顺北油气田超深井井身结构优化设计. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 6-11 .
![]() | |
26. |
陈修平,李双贵,于洋,周丹. 顺北油气田碳酸盐岩破碎性地层防塌钻井液技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(02): 12-16 .
![]() | |
27. |
操银香,李柏颉,郭媛. 高压注水扩容在缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏中的应用——以塔河S1井为例. 油气藏评价与开发. 2020(02): 49-53 .
![]() | |
28. |
杨万有,郑春峰,李昂,尹莎莎,郭晓飞,赵展,卢勇. 可控冲击波致裂海上油层可行性分析. 钻采工艺. 2020(01): 38-41+9 .
![]() | |
29. |
王建云,杨晓波,王鹏,范红康. 顺北碳酸盐岩裂缝性气藏安全钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(03): 8-15 .
![]() | |
30. |
李子甲,吴霞,黄文强. 深层碳酸盐岩储层有机酸深穿透酸压工艺. 科学技术与工程. 2020(20): 8146-8151 .
![]() | |
31. |
丁士东,赵向阳. 中国石化重点探区钻井完井技术新进展与发展建议. 石油钻探技术. 2020(04): 11-20 .
![]() | |
32. |
雷林,张龙胜,熊炜. 渝东南地区茅口组气藏大石1HF井酸压工艺技术研究. 油气藏评价与开发. 2020(05): 84-90 .
![]() | |
33. |
游利军,孟森,高新平,康毅力,陈明君,邵佳新. 碳酸盐岩储气库储层微粒运移对酸化的响应. 断块油气田. 2020(05): 676-680 .
![]() |