Lin Yuanhua, Li Guanghui, Hu Qiang, Liu Wanying. Experimental Study on Drill Pipe Stress-Fatigue Life Curve[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 124-128. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504022
Citation: Lin Yuanhua, Li Guanghui, Hu Qiang, Liu Wanying. Experimental Study on Drill Pipe Stress-Fatigue Life Curve[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 124-128. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504022

Experimental Study on Drill Pipe Stress-Fatigue Life Curve

More Information
  • Received Date: January 08, 2015
  • Revised Date: June 10, 2015
  • Drill pipe failure due to fatigue is the main cause of the oilfield drilling accidents, so it is necessary to study the stress-fatigue life curves of drill pipes. The fatigue performances of S135 and G105 drill pipe materials were studied by using the rotating bending fatigue testing machine. The logarithmic normal distribution model was adopted to obtain the stress-fatigue life curves corresponding to any survival rates. The direct extrapolation and 2m-1 index method were adopted to extend the fatigue curve into long-life area and the extrapolated fatigue results were compared with the up-and-down method results. The up-and-down method showed that the fatigue strengths of S135 and G105 drill pipes (survival rate was 99% and confidence level was 95%) were 550.19 MPa and 454.79 MPa respectively. The corresponding strengths of drill pipes S135 and G105 were 510.23 MPa and 402.01 MPa respectively when the fatigue life obtained by the curve with direct extrapolation survival rate of 99% was 1.0×107, while the 2m-1 method showed that when the curve of survival rate 99% obtained a fatigue life of 1.0×107, the drill pipe strengths were 532.95 MPa and 428.98 MPa respectively. The tests turned out that the fatigue strengths extrapolated by these two methods were both less than the test values. The fatigue strength value measured by the 2m-1 index method was closer to the test value by up-and-down method, so the 2m-1 index method was recommended to extrapolate the probability-stress-fatigue life curves so that a complete fatigue life curve could be obtained.
  • [1]
    刘志超,冯爽,姚久红,等.钻杆的失效分析和检测现状及其研究进展[J].热加工工艺,2015,44(6):8-11. Liu Zhichao,Feng Shuang,Yao Jiuhong,et al. Reaserch progress and detection current status and progress of drill pipe failure[J].Hot Working Technology,2015,44(6):8-11.
    [2]
    刘永刚,陈绍安,李齐富,等.复杂深井钻具失效研究[J].石油矿场机械,2010,39(9):13-16. Liu Yonggang,Chen Shaoan, Li Qifu,et al. Study on failure drill string in complex deep well[J]. Oil Field Equipment,2010,39(9):13-16.
    [3]
    万里平,孟英峰,杨龙,等.钻柱失效原因及预防措施[J]. 钻采工艺,2006,29(1):57-59. Wan Liping,Meng Yingfeng,Yang Long,et al. Failure cause and preventive measures of drill stem[J].Drilling Production Technology,2006,29(1):57-59.
    [4]
    王文龙,赵勤,李子丰,等.普光气田气体钻井钻具失效原因分析及预防措施[J].石油钻采工艺,2008,30(5):38-43. Wang Wenlong,Zhao Qin,Li Zifeng,et al. Cause analysis and precautions of drilling tools failure during gas drilling in Puguang Gas Field[J]. Oil Drilling Production Technology,2008,30(5):38-43.
    [5]
    林元华,罗宏志,邹波,等.钻柱失效机理及其疲劳寿命预测研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2004,26(1):19-22. Lin Yuanhua,Luo Hongzhi,Zou Bo,et al. Research on the failure mechanism and fatigue life predication of drill pipe[J].Oil Drilling Production Technology,2004,26(1):19-22.
    [6]
    吕拴录,倪渊诠,杨成新,等. 某油田钻具失效统计分析[J]. 理化检验,2012,48(6):414-418. Lv Shuanlu,Ni Yuanquan,Yang Chengxin,et al.Statistic analysis on drilling tools failure in one oil field[J]. Physical Testing and Chenmical Analysis,2012,48(6):414-418.
    [7]
    Lv Shuanlu,Feng Yaorong,Luo Faqian,et al. Failure analysis of IEU drill pipe wash out[J]. International Journal of Fatigue,2005,27(10/11/12):1360-1365.
    [8]
    Ziomek-Moroz M. Environmentally assisted cracking of drill pipes in deep drilling oil and natural gas wells[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,2012,21(6):1061-1069.
    [9]
    Kohout J,Vechet S. A new function for fatigue curves characterization and its multiple merits[J]. International Journal of Fatigue,2001,23(2):175-183.
    [10]
    GB/T 4337—2008 金属材料 疲劳试验 旋转弯曲方法[S]. GB/T 4337—2008 Metallic materials-fatigue testing-rotating bar bending method[S].
    [11]
    陈传尧.疲劳与断裂[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2001:47-54. Chen Chuanyao. Fatigue and fracture[M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science Technology Press,2001:47-54.
    [12]
    王强,赵永翔,王欢.铁路D1车轮钢的疲劳可靠性寿命与强度的试验及表征[J].机械工程学报,2014,50(14):50-55. Wang Qiang,Zhao Yongxiang,Wang Huan. Experiments and characterization on the probabilistic fatigue lives and strengths of D1 railway wheel steel[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2014,50(14):50-55.
    [13]
    杨冰,赵永翔,邬平波,等.16MnR钢焊接头的延拓概率疲劳S-N曲线[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(4):25-29. Yang Bing,Zhao Yongxiang,Wu Pingbo,et al. Extrapolation of probabilistic fatigue S-N curves on 16MnR steel weld joint[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2004,4(4):25-29.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YU Libin, ZHANG Zhigang, JIANG Zhaomin, XU Hui, ZHANG Hongfu, HAN Xurui. Development and Field Testing of the Bionic Peristaltic Drilling Tool[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2025, 53(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2024113
    [2]HUANG Feng, CHEN Shichun, LIU Lichao, GUO Chao, LIU Yibin, SHI Yucai. Development and Field Test of BH-VDT3000 Vertical Drilling System[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(6): 62-68. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2024114
    [3]LIU Jianhua, LING Wenxue, WANG Heng. Study on Rock Breaking Mechanism and Field Test of Triangular Prismatic PDC Cutters[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 46-50. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021040
    [4]LIU Pingquan, LI Leibing, SHI Yucen, HAN Long. Research and Field Test of Electrically Controlled Sidewall Deep Penetrating Perforating Technology[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021055
    [5]LUO Hengrong, CUI Xiaojie, TAN Yong, LI Youyan, ZHAO Jianjun. Research and Field Test on Drilling Acceleration Technology with Hydraulic Torsional Impactor Combined with Hydraulic Boosters[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(3): 58-62. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2020037
    [6]YANG Haibo, HOU Ting, FENG Dejie, TENG Zhaozheng, WU Liugen. Research and Field Test of Non-Drilling Plug Expandable Casing Patching Technology[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45(5): 73-77. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201705013
    [7]ZHENG Xiaozhi, GU Lei, MA Lanrong, ZHANG Guoan. Performance and Field Tests of Rotary Expandable Liner Hanger[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(3): 55-60. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201603010
    [8]Wang Zaiming, Zhu Kuanliang, Feng Jinghai, Wu Yan, Shen Yuanyuan. Development and Field Test of High-Temperature Gel Valve[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 78-82. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201504014
    [9]Yang Liqiang, Ba Lujun, Xue Jiangping. Development and Field Experiment on PDM with Uniform Wall Thickness[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.02.021
    [10]Liu Gang, Sun Jin, He Baosheng, Tian Ji, Geng Zhanli. Design and Field Test of Surface Monitoring System for Directional Wells Anti-Collision[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(1): 7-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.01.002
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 何晓波,苏军伟,罗攀登,王乐,吕新雄. 一种固体颗粒酸酸化过程预测新模型及其应用. 科学技术与工程. 2024(20): 8504-8511 .
    2. 王鼎立,汪全航,石孝志,钱思蓓,张照阳,鲍晋,张阳,毛金成. 适用于超高温碳酸盐岩储层的环保型固体酸体系研究. 现代化工. 2024(S2): 296-302 .
    3. 杨兆中,彭擎东,王振普,李小刚,朱静怡,秦杨. 微胶囊固体酸酸化压裂技术应用及展望. 特种油气藏. 2023(03): 1-8 .
    4. 全红平,杨星,刘鹏飞. 碳酸盐岩储层低黏酸化缓速剂关键吸附单体研究. 断块油气田. 2023(04): 698-704 .
    5. 周彪,豆连营,王洪斌. ADSA环保固体酸在某气田酸化压裂中的应用. 山东化工. 2023(22): 182-184 .
    6. 冯新根,方俊伟,方裕燕,潘丽娟. 抗高温隔离膜缓速酸液体系研制与性能评价. 石油钻探技术. 2023(06): 99-105 . 本站查看
    7. 韦敏,冯文涛,寸锡宏,朱骏蒙,任兆林,张勇,任晓强,沈飞,李年银. 深部酸化用胶囊酸体系在渤海湾盆地海上油田的应用. 石油钻采工艺. 2023(05): 616-624 .
    8. 林永茂,缪尉杰,刘林,李永明,邱玲. 川西南靖和1井茅口组立体酸压技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(02): 105-112 . 本站查看
    9. 纪成,赵兵,李建斌,罗攀登,房好青. 温度响应地下自生成支撑剂研究. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 45-51 . 本站查看
    10. 李继勇,孙玉海,卢占国,张云芝,孟博,宋时权,吴洋. 适用于碳酸盐岩储层的固体酸解堵体系. 钻井液与完井液. 2022(04): 516-521 .
    11. 顾浩,尚根华,李慧莉,王强,朱莲花,赵锐,康志江,李王鹏. 基于井温的超深断溶体油藏油井动用深度计算. 特种油气藏. 2021(02): 57-62 .
    12. 李永康,贾贻勇,张广中,王宏万,崔玉海. 胜利油田注水井分层酸化管柱研究现状及发展建议. 石油钻探技术. 2021(03): 129-134 . 本站查看
    13. 龚蔚. 深层裂缝型碳酸盐岩油藏水平井水力喷射酸压技术. 断块油气田. 2020(06): 808-811 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3186) PDF downloads (3915) Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return