A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters

Gui Junchuan; Xia Hongquan; Zou Yong; Gong Haohao

doi:10.11911/syztjs.201501014

Volume 43 Issue 1

Jan. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Petroleum Drilling Techniques > 2015 > 43(1): 82-87. > DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201501014

Gui Junchuan, Xia Hongquan, Zou Yong, Gong Haohao. A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(1): 82-87. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201501014

Citation:

PDF (1732 KB)

A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters

1.
State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University), Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, China;
2.
Geophysical Logging Company, Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Service Corporation, Puyang, Henan, 457001, China

More Information

Received Date: July 03, 2014

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To improve the precision of interpretation of gas reservoir to correlate with the rate of logging, a study using logging rock mechanics parameters to calculate gas saturation of sand and shale rock formations was carried out(hereinafter referred to as the new method).Based on the physical volume in the rock model and the bulk modulus, the formulas of volume compressibility, the fluid compressibility and gas compressibility factors were deduced, and a gas saturation calculation model was established.Based on the logging data in S gas field, the gas saturation results were calculated by the new method, the Archie formula, the Physical Analysis were contrasted, and a controlled evaluation with gas testing conclusion was conducted.The study revealed that the average error of the gas saturation calculated by the new method with the gas saturation from the Archie formula, and the gas saturation from the Physical Analysis in the gas zone was 3.5%, and the poor gas reservoir was 4.0%, the values of the saturation were quite the same.The values of the saturation calculated by new method were quite different with another two methods in dry layer and poor reservoir, but the same with the gas testing result.This proved the advantages of the new method.Studies suggested that this method of calculating the gas saturation could be used as an effective complement to Archie formula.
- log data,
- rock mechanics,
- sandstone,
- mudstone,
- compression factor,
- gas saturation

FullText(HTML)

References (17)

References

[1]	刘福利.哈萨克斯坦油田复杂储层饱和度计算方法研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 2008. Liu Fuli.Kazakhstan oilfield complex reservoirs saturation calculation method[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), School of Energy Resources, 2008.
[2]	毕研斌, 石红萍.常规测井资料解释含油饱和度的厚度参数校正[J].断块油气田, 2005, 12(1):38-40. Bi Yanbin, Shi Hongping.Thickness parameter correction on interpreting oil saturation with conventional well logging data[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2005, 12(1):38-40.
[3]	赵良孝, 张树东, 胡玲.复杂碳酸盐岩储层含油气饱和度计算方法探索[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(9):42-44. Zhao Liangxiao, Zhang Shudong, Hu Ling.Calculation methods of the oil and gas saturation in complex carbonate reservoir[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(9):42-44.
[4]	刘伟, 张德峰, 刘海河, 等.数字岩心技术在致密砂岩储层含油饱和度评价中的应用[J].断块油气田, 2013, 20(5):593-596. Liu Wei, Zhang Defeng, Liu Haihe, et al. Application of digital core technology in oil saturation appraisal of tight sandstone reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2013, 20(5):593-596.
[5]	肖亮, 梁晓东, 林雨静.储层原始含油饱和度评价新方法研究[J].石油地质与工程, 2007, 21(6):53-55. Xiao Liang, Liang Xiaodong, Lin Yujing.Study on a new method for evaluating initial oil saturation of reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2007, 21(6):53-55.
[6]	Brie A, Pampuri F, Marsala A F, et al.Shear sonic inter-pretation in gas-bearing sands[R].SPE 30595, 1995.
[7]	赵辉, 司马立强, 戴诗华, 等.利用纵横波速度判别火成岩气、水层的理论基础及应用[J].测井技术, 2012, 36(6):602-606. Zhao Hui, Si ma Liqiang, Dai Shihua, et al.The theoretical principle and application of distinguishing igneous gas and water layers using vp/vs[J].Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(6):602-606.
[8]	罗宁, 刘子平, 殷增华, 等.利用纵横波速度比判断储层流体性质[J].测井技术, 2008, 32(4):331-333. Luo Ning, Liu Ziping, Yan Zenghua, et al.Identifying reservoir fluid nature with the ratio of compressional wave velocity to shear wave velocity[J].Well Logging Technology, 2008, 32(4):331-333.
[9]	Saxena V.Hydrocarbon evaluation through modulus de-composition of sonic velocities in shaly sands[C].SPWLA 37th Annual Logging Symposium, 1996.
[10]	黄国骞.泊松比在储层及流体识别中的应用//中国地球物理学会.中国地球物理:第二十三届年会[G].青岛:中国海洋大学出版社, 2007:244. Huang Guoqian.Poissons Ratio in reservoir fluid identification// Chinese Geophysical Society.The Chinese Geophysics:the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting[G].Qingdao:China Ocean University Press, 2007:244.
[11]	张永军, 顾定娜, 马肃滨, 等.阵列声波测井资料在吐哈油田致密砂岩气层识别中的应用[J].测井技术, 2012, 36(2):175-178. Zhang Yongjun, Gu Dingna, Ma Subin, et al.The application of a array acoustic wave data to tight sandstone gas reservoir in Tuha Oilfield[J].Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(2):175-178.
[12]	云美厚, 丁伟, 王新红.利用声波全波列测井确定剩余油饱和度方法研究[J].测井技术, 2004, 28(1):20-23. Yun Meihou, Ding Wei, Wang Xinhong.On methods for predicting residual oil saturation using sonic full waveform logging[J].Well Logging Technology, 2004, 28(1):20-23.
[13]	毛志强, 谭廷栋.密度测井和中子测井的相关性及其在识别天然气层中的应用[J].地球物理学报, 1996, 39(1):125-133. Mao Zhiqiang, Tan Tingdong.The correlativity of density log and neturon log and its applation in idenfitying gas formations[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1996, 39(1):125-133.
[14]	汤金奎, 王绍春, 高伟, 等.碳氧比能谱测井在冀东油田的应用[J].测井技术, 2013, 37(4):436-440. Shang Jinkui, Wang Shaochun, Gao Wei, et al.Application of C/O spectral logging in Jidong Oilfield[J].Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(4):436-440.
[15]	章成广, 江万哲, 潘和平.声波测井原理与应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:137-141. Zhang Chengguang, Jiang Wanzhe, Pan Heping.Sonic logging principles and applications[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:137-141.
[16]	何更生.油层物理[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1994:127-137. He Gengsheng.Reservoir physics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1994:127-137.
[17]	刘厚彬, 孟英峰, 王先起, 等.利用测井资料预测地层孔隙压力方法研究综述[J].西部探矿工程, 2006, 18(6):91-93. Liu Houbin, Meng Yingfeng, Wang Xianqi, et al.Study on methods of anticipating formation pore pressures with logging data[J].West-China Exploration Engineering, 2006, 18(6):91-93.

[1]	YANG Pengcheng, XUE Haonan, LI Sheng, CHEN Keshan. A New Model for Calculating Deviation Factor of Natural Gas in Ultra-Deep Oil and Gas Reservoirs under High Pressure[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(6): 106-114. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023112
[2]	GUO Tongzheng, ZHANG Jinyan, CHAI Jing, BAO Boting, SUN Jianmeng. Methodology of Calculating Oil Saturation and the GOR of Shale Based on Logging Data[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(3): 126-136. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023067
[3]	ZHANG Jinping, NI Huafeng, SHI Peiming. Safe and Efficient Drilling in Presalt High-Sulfur Reservoirs in the Eastern Gas Fields of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(3): 22-29. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023073
[4]	YANG Xu, LI Gao, MENG Yingfeng, LIU Lin. Quantitative Evaluation Model of Water Blocking Damage in Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(1): 101-106. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019008
[5]	LU Hongjiang, YANG Hongzhi, Moh’d M. Amro, HE Yongming, XU Wei, LU Jie, M. Szabries. Drying Process in Underground Gas Storage Reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(4): 1-8. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2018122
[6]	LIU Zixiong, WANG Xingzun, LI Jingsong, HUANG Zijun, WU Ying. New Technique in the Identification of Water-Gas Interface in Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs from Core Data[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(6): 88-92. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201606015
[7]	LU Fawei, WANG Jianping, CHEN Jinlong. Resistivity Determination Methods in Original Formations[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(5): 117-121. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201605020
[8]	JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing. The Novel Technology of Shale Gas Play Evaluation——Sweetness Calculation Method[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(4): 1-6. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201604001
[9]	Zhang Jinyan, Liu Haihe, Liu Wei, Sun Jianmeng, Zhao Jianpeng. Thin Sand and Mudstone Interbed Saturation Model Based on a Dual Mudstone Indicator[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(2): 59-62. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201502011
[10]	Sun Xiaojie, Cheng Yuanfang, Li Lingdong, Cui Qing, Li Qingping. Triaxial Compression Test on Synthetic Core Sample with Simulated Hydrate-Bearing Sediments[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(4): 52-57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.04.011

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

1.	杨清纯，山丽洁，王伟，赵新波，李亚龙，张立松. 基于Rosenbluthe改进方法的地层坍塌压力不确定性分析. 石油物探. 2025(01): 187-198 .
2.	易浩，郭挺，孙连忠. 顺北油气田二叠系火成岩钻井技术研究与应用. 钻探工程. 2024(01): 131-138 .
3.	刘岩生，张佳伟，黄洪春. 中国深层—超深层钻完井关键技术及发展方向. 石油学报. 2024(01): 312-324 .
4.	何龙，何新星，张玉胜，严焱诚，刘伟，朱礼平. 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组井研—犍为地区瘦身井优化评价研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 155-164 .
5.	杨树东，武兴勇，钟震，宋琳. 新疆油田某区块井身结构优化设计与应用. 广东化工. 2023(04): 129-131 .
6.	李双贵，罗江，于洋，汤明，易浩，曾德智. 顺北5号断裂带南部压力剖面建立及井身结构优化. 石油钻探技术. 2023(01): 9-15 . 本站查看
7.	褚清琳，温炜，焦超. 顺北油气田高温定向井循环降温控制方法. 中国石油和化工标准与质量. 2023(06): 137-138 .
8.	王刚，刘刚，王锴，李祎宸，常子昂，孔得臣. 油气井下套管遇阻研究现状与展望. 科学技术与工程. 2023(11): 4475-4486 .
9.	王逸，陈超，董小虎，宋泓钢. 顺北油气田钻遇局部异常高压的认识及对策. 西部探矿工程. 2023(10): 57-60 .
10.	马永生，蔡勋育，云露，李宗杰，李慧莉，邓尚，赵培荣. 塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展. 石油勘探与开发. 2022(01): 1-17 .
11.	MA Yongsheng，CAI Xunyu，YUN Lu，LI Zongjie，LI Huili，DENG Shang，ZHAO Peirong. Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field, Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2022(01): 1-20 .
12.	李文霞，王居贺，王治国，杨卫星，史玉才. 顺北油气田超深高温水平井井眼轨迹控制技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 18-24 . 本站查看
13.	刘湘华，刘彪，杜欢，王沫. 顺北油气田断裂带超深水平井优快钻井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 11-17 . 本站查看
14.	陈宗琦，刘湘华，白彬珍，易浩. 顺北油气田特深井钻井完井技术进展与发展思考. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 1-10 . 本站查看
15.	赵向阳，赵聪，王鹏，梁晓阳，杨谋. 超深井井筒温度数值模型与解析模型计算精度对比研究. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 69-75 . 本站查看
16.	张延兵，李录科，史配铭. 储气库水平井井身结构优化技术及应用. 当代化工研究. 2022(15): 135-138 .
17.	孙荣，张猛. 顺北1-AH井二开长裸眼固井技术. 新型工业化. 2022(06): 13-16+26 .
18.	张煜，李海英，陈修平，卜旭强，韩俊. 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深断控缝洞型油气藏地质-工程一体化实践与成效. 石油与天然气地质. 2022(06): 1466-1480 .
19.	白彬珍，曾义金，葛洪魁. 顺北56X特深水平井钻井关键技术. 石油钻探技术. 2022(06): 49-55 . 本站查看
20.	王莉，秦文斌，易争利. 复兴地区侏罗系页岩油气水平井井身结构优化设计. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2022(06): 28-30+34 .
21.	崔月明，史海民，张清. 吉林油田致密油水平井优快钻井完井技术. 石油钻探技术. 2021(02): 9-13 . 本站查看
22.	唐磊，王建峰，曹敬华，杨敏，李双贵. 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深断溶体油藏地质工程一体化模式探索. 油气藏评价与开发. 2021(03): 329-339 .
23.	李涛，郭清，程兴洁. 四川盆地L203井区钻井“喷漏同存”浅析. 石化技术. 2021(05): 157-158 .
24.	史配铭，李晓明，倪华峰，石崇东，姜庆波，程华林. 苏里格气田水平井井身结构优化及钻井配套技术. 石油钻探技术. 2021(06): 29-36 . 本站查看
25.	胡大梁，欧彪，何龙，肖国益，李文生，唐宇祥. 川西海相超深大斜度井井身结构优化及钻井配套技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(03): 22-28 . 本站查看
26.	于洋，刘士银. 高速旋冲钻井技术优化及在顺北区块的试验. 石油机械. 2020(10): 24-29+38 .
27.	李剑. 南海东部某老油田新钻调整井井身结构瘦身. 中国石油和化工标准与质量. 2020(18): 182+184 .
28.	李磊，杨进，刘宝生，赵少伟，张灿，杨宇鹏，张昌超，邹欣. 渤海渤中区域深井井身结构优化. 石油钻采工艺. 2020(05): 569-572 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (3884) PDF downloads (4818) Cited by(33)

A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

A New Method to Calculate the Gas Saturation of the Sand and Shale Formations Based on Logging Rock Mechanics Parameters

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content