顺北油气田超深井井身结构优化设计

李双贵; 于洋; 樊艳芳; 曾德智

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2020002

顺北油气田超深井井身结构优化设计

李双贵^{1, 2,},
于洋^{1, 2},
樊艳芳^{1, 2},
曾德智³

1.
中国石化西北油田分公司石油工程技术研究院，新疆乌鲁木齐 830011
2.
中国石化缝洞型油藏提高采收率重点实验室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830011
3.
油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室（西南石油大学），四川成都 610500

基金项目: 中国石油化工股份有限公司重大科技项目群“顺北油气田一区优快钻井技术研究”（编号：P18021-1）部分研究内容

详细信息

作者简介:
李双贵（1979—），男，四川合江人，2004年毕业于西南石油学院石油工程专业，高级工程师，主要从事钻井技术优化与研究工作。E-mail：lisg.xbsj@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE22
计量
- 文章访问数: 2171
- HTML全文浏览量: 831
- PDF下载量: 203
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-07-18
- 修回日期: 2019-12-04
- 网络出版日期: 2019-12-25
- 刊出日期: 2020-02-29

Optimal Design of Casing Programs for Ultra-Deep Wellsin the Shunbei Oil and Gas Field

LI Shuanggui^{1, 2,},
YU Yang^{1, 2},
FAN Yanfang^{1, 2},
ZENG Dezhi³

1.
Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China
2.
Sinopec Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery for Fracture-Cave Oil Reservoir, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830011, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploration, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuang, 610500, China

摘要

摘要:
随着顺北油气田勘探开发的不断深入，原有井身结构开始显现出钻井风险大、效率低等问题，亟需优化井身结构。为此，利用已钻井的测井资料，利用Drillworks 软件计算了地层的孔隙压力、破裂压力和坍塌压力，并结合已钻井的钻井资料和岩石力学试验结果对计算结果进行修正，得到了顺北油气田地层的三压力剖面，根据地层三压力剖面确定了地质工程必封点。根据地质工程必封点，综合考虑钻井技术水平和钻井完井要求，设计了5种井身结构，通过预测5种井身结构的钻井周期、钻井成本，对比优缺点，选用了四开非常规井身结构。顺北油气田超深井采用四开非常规井身结构后，机械钻速提高30%～40%，钻井周期缩短33～45 d，均顺利钻至目的层。这表明，顺北油气田采用优化后的井身结构，提高了钻井效率，降低了钻井风险。
- 超深井 /
- 井身结构 /
- 优化设计 /
- 钻井周期 /
- 钻井成本 /
- 顺北油气田
Abstract:
As exploration & development of the Shunbei Oil and Gas Field continues to deepen, the original casing program shows the problems such as high drilling risk and low efficiency, and it is necessary to optimize the casing program. With this in mind, we utilizled the logging data of drilled wells, to calculate the pore pressure, fracture pressure, and collapsing pressure of formation with Drillworks software, and the calculation results were corrected by combining with the drilling data of drilled wells and rock mechanics test results. Hence, it was possible to obtain the formation three-pressure profile of Shunbei Oil and Gas Field, and further define the necessary sealing points for geological engineering according to the profile. Based on the necessary sealing points, by comprehensively considering the drilling technical level and drilling/completion requirements, 5 types of casing program were designed. By predicting the drilling periods and drilling costs of those 5 types of casing program, and comparing the advantages and disadvantages, a four-spud unconventional casing program was selected properly. After this casing program was used in the Shunbei Oil and Gas Field, the ROP was increased by 30%–40%, the drilling period was shortened by 33–45 d, and all the wells reached the target layers smoothly. It indicated that the optimized casing program in Shunbei Oil and Gas Field improved drilling efficiency and reduced drilling risks.
- ultra-deep wells /
- casing program /
- optimized design /
- drilling period /
- drilling cost /
- Shunbei Gas and Oil Field

HTML全文

图 1 已钻井井身结构

Figure 1. Casing program of drilled wells in Shunbei Oil and Gas Field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 顺北油气田地层三压力剖面

Figure 2. Formation three-pressure profile of Shunbei Oil and Gas Field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 长裸眼井身结构

Figure 3. Casing program of long open hole horizontal well

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 膨胀管临时封隔低压地层的四开井身结构

Figure 4. Casing program of temporarily isolating low-pressure formation with expandable tube

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 增加ϕ339.7 mm套管下深封隔二叠系地层的五开井身结构

Figure 5. Casing program of increasing the setting depth of ϕ339.7 mm casing to seal the Permian

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 五开非常规井身结构

Figure 6. Unconventional five-spud casing program

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 四开非常规井身结构

Figure 7. Unconventional four-spud casing program

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同井身结构优缺点对比

Table 1 Comparison on the advantages and disadvantages of different casing program

井身结构	完钻井眼直径/mm	钻井周期/ d	钻井成本/ 万元	优点	缺点
五开长裸眼ϕ244.5 mm套管直下	149.2	165	4 179	钻井难度低，钻井周期较短	裸眼段长，井壁稳定难度大
五开长裸眼ϕ244.5 mm套管悬挂回接	149.2	179	4 421	钻井难度低
四开扩孔下膨胀管	149.2	185	5 077	机械方式封隔二叠系、志留系地层，利于安全钻井	膨胀管下入段长，存在风险
五开ϕ339.7 mm套管封隔二叠系地层	149.2	215	6 803	机械方式封隔二叠系、志留系地层，利于安全钻井，	ϕ339.7 mm套管下入难度大，钻井周期长，需采用钻深8 000 m以上钻机
五开非常规	149.2	200	4 991	机械方式封隔二叠系、志留系，利于安全钻井	井眼开次多，采用常规钻井技术难以实现，钻井周期长
四开非常规	143.9	158	3 897	钻井周期短、钻井成本低，钻井难度低	裸眼段长，井壁稳定难度大

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(12)

[1]	刘彪,潘丽娟,易浩,等. 顺北含辉绿岩超深井井身结构优化设计[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(3): 296–301. LIU Biao, PAN Lijuan, YI Hao, et al. Casing program optimization of ultra-deep well with diabase reservoir in Shunbei Block[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(3): 296–301.
[2]	刘彪,白彬珍,潘丽娟,等. 托甫台区块含盐膏层深井井身结构优化设计[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(4): 48–52. LIU Biao, BAI Binzhen, PAN Lijuan, et al. Casing program of deep well with evaporite bed in Tuofutai Block[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(4): 48–52.
[3]	林永学,王伟吉,金军斌. 顺北油气田鹰1井超深井段钻井液关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(3): 113–120. LIN Yongxue, WANG Weiji, JIN Junbin. Key drilling fluid technology in the ultra deep section of Well Ying-1 in the Shunbei Oil and Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 113–120.
[4]	陈养龙,席宝滨,晁文学,等. 顺北区块Ⅰ号断裂带钻井分层提速技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(5): 649–652. CHEN Yanglong, XI Baobin, CHAO Wenxue, et al. Improving drilling speed technologies by stratification for No.1 fault-zone of Shunbei Block[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(5): 649–652.
[5]	牛晓,潘丽娟,甄玉辉,等. SHB1-6H 井长裸眼钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2016, 33(5): 30–34. NIU Xiao, PAN Lijuan, ZHEN Yuhui, et al. Drilling fluid technology for long open hole section of Well SHB1-6H[J]. Drilling fluid & Completion Fluid, 2016, 33(5): 30–34.
[6]	易浩,杜欢,贾晓斌,等. 塔河油田及周缘超深井井身结构优化设计[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2015, 43(1): 75–81. YI Hao, DU Huan, JIA Xiaobin, et al. The Optimal design of a casing program for uitra-deep wells in the Tahe Oilfield and its periphery[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(1): 75–81.
[7]	蒋廷学,周珺,贾文峰,等. 顺北油气田超深碳酸盐岩储层深穿透酸压技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(3): 140–147. JIANG Tingxue, ZHOU Jun, JIA Wenfeng, et al. Deep penetration acid-fracturing technology for ultra-deep carbonate oil & gas reservoirs in the Shunbei Oil and Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 140–147.
[8]	朱忠喜,李思豪,关志刚,等. 红153井区井身结构优化设计及应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2018, 41(6): 125–128. ZHU Zhongxi, LI Sihao, GUAN Zhigang, et al. Optimization design and application of casing program for Hong 153 well area[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 41(6): 125–128.
[9]	邹灵战, 葛云华, 张军, 等. 龙岗地区复杂压力层系下非常规井身结构设计与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33（增刊2）: 189–196. ZOU Lingzhan, GE Yunhua, ZHANG Jun, et al. Design and application of unconventional casing program for complex pressure strata in Longgang Area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(supplement 2): 189–196.
[10]	李宁,周小君,周波,等. 塔里木油田HLHT区块超深井钻井提速配套技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2017, 45(2): 10–14. LI Ning, ZHOU Xiaojun, ZHOU Bo, et al. Technologies for fast drilling ultra-deep wells in the HLHT Block, Tarim Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45(2): 10–14.
[11]	赵志国, 白彬珍, 何世明, 等. 顺北油田超深井优快钻井技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2017, 45(6): 8–13. ZHAO Zhiguo, BAI Binzhen, HE Shiming, et al. Optimization of fast drilling technology for uitra-deep wells in the Shunbei Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45(6): 8–13.
[12]	陈曾伟,刘四海,林永学,等. 塔河油田顺西2井二叠系火成岩裂缝性地层堵漏技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2014, 31(1): 40–43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2014.01.011 CHEN Zengwei, LIU Sihai, LIN Yongxue, et al. Lost circulation control technology for fractured Permian igneous rock formation in Well Shunxi 2 of Tahe Oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2014, 31(1): 40–43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2014.01.011

施引文献(16)

期刊类型引用(9)

1.	李新发，李婷，刘博峰，张峰，肖志明，王浩帆. 基于压裂监测的致密储层甜点识别. 断块油气田. 2020(05): 603-607 . 百度学术
2.	冯福平，黄芮，雷扬，GUO Boyun，胡超洋，王胡振. 基于能量理论的体积压裂工程改造效果评价模型及应用. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(01): 81-89 . 百度学术
3.	田林海，屈刚，雷鸣，于德成，张伟. 玛湖油田玛18井区体积压裂对钻井作业干扰问题的探讨. 石油钻探技术. 2019(01): 20-24 . 本站查看
4.	刘子雄，王艳红，高杰，冯青，樊爱彬. 基于压裂返排数据的有效破裂体积计算方法. 石油地质与工程. 2019(02): 112-115 . 百度学术
5.	魏旭，张永平，尚立涛，王海涛，吴森昊. 多段多簇压裂储层改造效果影响因素分析. 油气地质与采收率. 2018(02): 96-102+114 . 百度学术
6.	修乃岭，严玉忠，管保山，王欣，王臻，严星明. 基于物质平衡原理对页岩气压裂储层有效改造体积进行估算方法研究. 石油地质与工程. 2018(06): 103-105 . 百度学术
7.	白晓虎，苏良银，赵伯平，达引朋，吴甫让，段鹏辉. 注采井网条件下水平井体积压裂重复改造优化设计. 断块油气田. 2017(02): 194-198 . 百度学术
8.	隋阳，刘建伟，郭旭东，向洪，王波，王涛. 体积压裂技术在红台低含油饱和度致密砂岩油藏的应用. 石油钻采工艺. 2017(03): 349-355 . 百度学术
9.	于永军，朱万成，李连崇，魏晨慧，代风，刘书源，王卫东. 水力压裂裂缝相互干扰应力阴影效应理论分析. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2017(12): 2926-2939 . 百度学术