孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层压裂裂缝转向扩展特征研究

孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层压裂裂缝转向扩展特征研究

Study on Propagation and Diversion Characteristics of Hydraulic Fractures in Vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs

孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层压裂裂缝转向扩展特征研究

Study on Propagation and Diversion Characteristics of Hydraulic Fractures in Vuggy Carbonate Reservoirs

期刊类型引用(4)

其他类型引用(0)

期刊类型引用(4)

其他类型引用(0)

目录

计量

计量

出版历程

计量

出版历程

作者简介:
吴峙颖（1987—），男，江苏海安人，2009 年毕业于中国石油大学（北京）石油工程专业，2012年获中国石油大学（北京）油气田开发工程专业硕士学位，2021年获中国石油勘探开发研究院油气田开发工程专业博士学位，副研究员，主要从事油气田储层改造技术研究工作。E-mail: 45825086@qq.com

吴峙颖; 胡亚斐; 蒋廷学; 张保平; 姚奕明; 董宁

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2022084

吴峙颖^{1, 2, 3,},
胡亚斐³,
蒋廷学^{1, 2},
张保平^{1, 2},
姚奕明^{1, 2},
董宁⁴

1.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 102206
2.
中石化石油工程技术研究院有限公司, 北京 102206
3.
中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
4.
天津昆仑燃气有限公司, 天津 300353

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划子课题“中东部深层高温地热系统分析与热储改造方法”（编号：2021YFA0716004）资助

详细信息

中图分类号: TE357.1⁺4
计量
- 文章访问数: 204
- HTML全文浏览量: 91
- PDF下载量: 39
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-09
- 修回日期: 2022-06-19
- 网络出版日期: 2022-11-03
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-24

WU Zhiying^{1, 2, 3,},
HU Yafei³,
JIANG Tingxue^{1, 2},
ZHANG Baoping^{1, 2},
YAO Yiming^{1, 2},
DONG Ning⁴

1.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing, 102206, China
2.
Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing, 102206, China
3.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing, 100083, China
4.
Tianjin Kunlun Gas Co., Ltd., Tianjin, 300353, China

摘要

摘要:
针对孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层改造产生的水力裂缝扩展规律复杂、不一定沿预设路径扩展的问题，基于碳酸盐岩储层孔洞体特征，制备了含孔洞体的碳酸盐岩试样；利用真三轴水力压裂试验结果，分析了不同水平主应力差异下孔洞体对水力裂缝扩展的干扰作用；并利用扩展有限元数值方法，分析了影响孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层水力裂缝扩展及扩展路径的因素。研究结果表明，水平主应力差异系数不大于0.15时，水力裂缝遇到孔洞体后产生非平面扩展，且水平主应力差越小，转向扩展距离越大，裂缝形态越复杂；水平主应力差异系数大于0.15、小于0.36时，水力裂缝会克服孔洞体的应力集中进行平面扩展，但遇到孔洞体后会被孔洞体捕捉，无法穿过孔洞体继续扩展；水平主应力差异系数不小于0.36时，水力裂缝会克服孔洞体的应力集中进行平面扩展，且遇到孔洞体后会直接穿过孔洞体继续扩展；随着水平主应力差增大，破裂压力逐渐降低。研究结果可为孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层压裂设计提供指导。
- 碳酸盐岩储层 /
- 孔洞体 /
- 应力差异系数 /
- 水力压裂 /
- 裂缝转向 /
- 物理模拟 /
- 有限元法
Abstract:
Hydraulic fractures generated in the stimulation of vuggy carbonate reservoirs feature complex propagation as they do not necessarily propagate along the prospected path. In view of this, vuggy carbonate rock samples were prepared based on the analysis of the vuggy characteristics of carbonate reservoirs. With test results of true triaxial hydraulic fracturing, the interference of cavities in the propagation of hydraulic fractures under different horizontal principal stress differences was investigated. Moreover, the extended numerical finite element method was used to analyze the factors affecting the propagation of hydraulic fractures in vuggy carbonate reservoirs and their propagation paths. The results revealed that non-planar propagation would occur when hydraulic fractures encountered cavities when the difference coefficient of the horizontal principal stress was below 0.15, and smaller horizontal principal stress was accompanied by a larger diversion propagation distance and more complex fracture pattern. When the coefficient was between 0.15 and 0.36, hydraulic fractures would overcome the stress concentration of cavities for planar propagation, but they would be captured by cavities encountered along the propagation path. When the coefficient was no less than 0.36, hydraulic fractures would overcome the stress concentration of cavities and penetrate cavities for planar propagation. In addition, the fracturing pressure would decrease as the stress difference increased. The research results can provide a reference for hydraulic fracturing design for vuggy carbonate reservoirs.
- carbonate reservoir /
- cavity /
- stress difference coefficient /
- hydraulic fracturing /
- fracture diversion /
- physical simulation /
- finite element method

HTML全文

图 1 制备含孔洞试样示意

Figure 1. Preparation of samples with cavities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 孔洞布置及地应力加载方向示意

Figure 2. Cavity distribution and in-situ stress loading direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同试样的水力裂缝扩展泵压–时间曲线

Figure 3. Pumping pressure-time curve of hydraulic fracture propagation of different samples

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 试样不同水平主应力差下的破裂压力

Figure 4. Fracture pressure of samples under different horizontal principal stress differences

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 试样D1水力裂缝的形态

Figure 5. Pattern of hydraulic fracture in Sample D1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 试样D2水力裂缝的形态

Figure 6. Pattern of hydraulic fracture in Sample D2

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 试样D3水力裂缝的形态

Figure 7. Pattern of hydraulic fracture in Sample D3

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 试样D4水力裂缝的形态

Figure 8. Pattern of hydraulic fracture in Sample D4

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同水平主应力差异系数下的裂缝形态示意

Figure 9. Fracture pattern under different horizontal principalstress difference coefficients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同水平主应力差下水力裂缝扩展的特征和路径

Figure 10. Propagation characteristics and paths of hydraulic fractures under different horizontal principal stress differences

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 含不同半径孔洞模型水力裂缝扩展特征

Figure 11. Propagation characteristics of hydraulic fractures in models with different radii cavities

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 含不同半径孔洞模型水力裂缝扩展路径

Figure 12. Propagation paths for hydraulic fractures in models with cavities of different radii

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 孔洞连续分布模型不同水平主应力差下水力裂缝扩展特征

Figure 13. Propagation characteristics of hydraulic fractures in models with continuous cavity distribution under different horizontal principal stress differences

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 碳酸盐岩试样压裂试验参数

Table 1 Fracturing test parameters of carbonate rock samples

试样	应力差异系数k	${\sigma_{⃑\text{v}}}$ / MPa	${\sigma _{\text{H}}}$ / MPa	${\sigma _{\text{h}}}$ / MPa	Q/（mL·min⁻¹）
D1	0.36	18	15	11	5
D2	0.25	18	15	12	5
D3	0.15	18	15	13	5
D4	0.07	18	15	14	5

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 数值模拟地应力参数设置

Table 2 Parameter setting of in-situ stress in numerical simulation

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	雷群,万玉金,李熙喆,等. 美国致密砂岩气藏开发与启示[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(1):45–48. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2010.01.012 LEI Qun, WAN Yujin, LI Xizhe, et al. A study on the development of tight gas reservoirs in the USA[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(1): 45–48. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2010.01.012
[2]	张倩,李年银,李长燕,等. 中国海相碳酸盐岩储层酸化压裂改造技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 特种油气藏,2020,27(2):1–7. ZHANG Qian, LI Nianyin, LI Changyan, et al. Overview and trend of acid-fracturing technology for marine carbonate reservoirs in China[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(2): 1–7.
[3]	丁士东,赵向阳. 中国石化重点探区钻井完井技术新进展与发展建议[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(4):11–20. DING Shidong, ZHAO Xiangyang. New progress and development suggestions for drilling and completion technologies in Sinopec key exploration areas[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(4): 11–20.
[4]	贺甲元,程洪,向红,等. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层暂堵转向压裂排量优化[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2021,43(2):233–238. HE Jiayuan, CHENG Hong, XIANG Hong, et al. Optimizing the displacement of temporary plugging and diversion fracturing of the carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2021, 43(2): 233–238.
[5]	吴丰,代槿,姚聪,等. 塔河油田奥陶系一间房组与鹰山组断溶体发育模式解剖[J]. 断块油气田,2022,29(1):33–39. WU Feng,DAI Jin,YAO Cong,et al. Developmental mode analysis of the fault-karst reservoir in Yijianfang Formation and Yingshan Formation of Ordovician in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(1): 33–39.
[6]	赵海洋,刘志远,唐旭海,等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层循缝找洞压裂技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2021,43(1):89–96. ZHAO Haiyang, LIU Zhiyuan, TANG Xuhai, et al. Fracturing technology of searching for vugs along fractures in fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2021, 43(1): 89–96.
[7]	苗娟,何旭晟,王栋,等. 水平井精细分段深度酸化压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏,2022,29(2):141–148. MIAO Juan, HE Xusheng, WANG Dong, et al. Study and application of fine segmented deep acid fracturing technology for horizontal wells[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2022, 29(2): 141–148.
[8]	钟小军,张锐,吴刚,等. 复杂非均质碳酸盐岩储层酸岩反应动力学特征及酸压对策研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2020,37(6):798–802. ZHONG Xiaojun, ZHANG Rui, WU Gang, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of acid rock reaction and acid fracturing countermeasures in complex heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(6): 798–802.
[9]	郭印同,杨春和,贾长贵,等. 页岩水力压裂物理模拟与裂缝表征方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(1):52–59. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.01.006 GUO Yintong, YANG Chunhe, JIA Changgui, et al. Research on hydraulic fracturing physical simulation of shale and fracture characterization methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 52–59. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.01.006
[10]	衡帅,杨春和,郭印同,等. 层理对页岩水力裂缝扩展的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(2):228–237. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.02.002 HENG Shuai, YANG Chunhe, GUO Yintong, et al. Influence of bedding planes on hydraulic fracture propagation in shale formations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 228–237. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.02.002
[11]	GUO Yintong, DENG Peng, YANG Chunhe, et al. Experimental investigation on hydraulic fracture propagation of carbonate rocks under different fracturing fluids[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(12): 1–15.
[12]	GUO Yintong, HOU Longfei, YAO Yiming, et al. Experimental study on influencing factors of fracture propagation in fractured carbonate rocks[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2020, 131: 103955. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103955
[13]	周大伟. 缝洞型岩石体积压裂试验模拟研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学（北京）, 2016. ZHOU Dawei. Experimental investigation on fracture-vug rock of SRV fracturing[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2016.
[14]	李林地,张士诚,张劲,等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层水力裂缝扩展机理[J]. 石油学报,2009,30(4):570–573. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.04.016 LI Lindi, ZHANG Shicheng, ZHANG Jin, et al. Mechanism of hydraulic fracture propagation in fracture-cavity carbonate reser-voirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 570–573. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2009.04.016
[15]	HUNSWECK M J, SHEN Yongxing, LEW A J. A finite element approach to the simulation of hydraulic fractures with lag[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2013, 37(9): 993–1015. doi: 10.1002/nag.1131
[16]	彪仿俊,刘合,张士诚,等. 水力压裂水平裂缝影响参数的数值模拟研究[J]. 工程力学,2011,28(10):228–235. BIAO Fangjun, LIU He, ZHANG Shicheng, et al. A numerical study of parameter influences on horizontal hydraulic fracture[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(10): 228–235.
[17]	张广明,刘合,张劲,等. 水平井水力压裂的三维有限元数值模拟研究[J]. 工程力学,2011,28(2):101–106. ZHANG Guangming, LIU He, ZHANG Jin, et al. Three-dimensional finite element numerical simulation of horizontal well hydraulic fracturing[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(2): 101–106.
[18]	侯龙飞. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩定向压裂模拟试验研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2020. HOU Longfei. Fracture-cavity carbonate directional fracturing simulation test research[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2020.
[19]	孟勇,贾庆升,张潦源,等. 东营凹陷页岩油储层层间干扰及裂缝扩展规律研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2021,49(4):130–138. MENG Yong, JIA Qingsheng, ZHANG Liaoyuan, et al. Research on interlayer interference and the fracture propagation law of shale oil reservoirs in the Dongying Sag [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 130–138.
[20]	崔壮,侯冰,付世豪,等. 页岩油致密储层一体化压裂裂缝穿层扩展特征[J]. 断块油气田,2022,29(1):111–117. CUI Zhuang, HOU Bing, FU Shihao, et al. Fractures cross-layer propagation characteristics of integrated fracturing in shale oil tight reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(1): 111–117.
[21]	李新勇,耿宇迪,刘志远,等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层压裂效果评价方法试验研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(6):88–93. LI Xinyong, GENG Yudi, LIU Zhiyuan, et al. An experimental study on evaluation methods for fracturing effect of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(6): 88–93.
[22]	MOËS N, DOLBOW J, BELYTSCHKO T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering., 1999, 46: 131–150. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J

施引文献(4)

1.	刘西恩，孙志峰，仇傲，李杰，罗博，彭凯旋，罗瑜林. 随钻四极子声波测井仪的设计及试验. 石油钻探技术. 2022(03): 125-131 . 本站查看
2.	孙志峰，仇傲，金亚，李杰，罗博，彭凯旋. 随钻多极子声波测井仪接收声系的优化设计与试验. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 114-120 . 本站查看
3.	李杰，刘西恩，罗博，孙志峰，仇傲，罗瑜林. 国产随钻单极声波测井仪的设计及应用. 石油管材与仪器. 2022(06): 38-43 . 百度学术
4.	米金泰，周珺，朱祖扬，李新，李丰波. 随钻声波仪器刻槽钻铤结构分析. 石油化工应用. 2018(02): 58-62 . 百度学术

资源附件(0)

图(13) / 表(2)

文章访问数: 204
HTML全文浏览量: 91
PDF下载量: 39
被引次数: 4

${\sigma _{\text{H}}}$ /MPa

${\sigma _{\text{h}}}$ / MPa

$\Dela \sigma$ / MPa