连续油管打捞砂埋节流器技术研究与现场试验

王思凡, 张安康, 胡东锋

王思凡, 张安康, 胡东锋. 连续油管打捞砂埋节流器技术研究与现场试验[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(5): 108-113. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021067
引用本文: 王思凡, 张安康, 胡东锋. 连续油管打捞砂埋节流器技术研究与现场试验[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(5): 108-113. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021067
WANG Sifan, ZHANG Ankang, HU Dongfeng. Research and Field Tests of Coiled Tubing Fishing Technology for Sand-Buried Throttles[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 108-113. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021067
Citation: WANG Sifan, ZHANG Ankang, HU Dongfeng. Research and Field Tests of Coiled Tubing Fishing Technology for Sand-Buried Throttles[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 108-113. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021067

连续油管打捞砂埋节流器技术研究与现场试验

基金项目: 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司科技项目“长庆气田老井复产关键材料开发与技术研究”(编号:CQ2020B-30-1-4)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王思凡(1988—),男,陕西泾阳人,2011年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)机械设计制造及自动化专业,2014年获中国石油大学(北京)机械工程专业硕士学位,工程师,主要从事钻采工艺、工具及装备的研究工作。E-mail:532295652@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TE358+.4

Research and Field Tests of Coiled Tubing Fishing Technology for Sand-Buried Throttles

  • 摘要: 为了解决节流器砂埋后打捞失败导致的气井关停问题,在分析卡瓦式节流器结构原理的基础上,提出了气井节流器的砂埋判识方法,分析了节流器砂埋后的打捞复杂原因;结合常规钢丝打捞作业、连续油管磨铣打捞作业和起管柱作业的节流器处理措施,研究了连续油管冲砂打捞砂埋节流器的技术思路和作业流程,推荐了冲砂打捞工具串,并分析了对应连续油管及油管直径的理论最小冲砂排量。现场试验4口水平井,冲砂后均成功打捞出了砂埋ϕ88.9 mm油管节流器,成功率100%,平均总耗时小于1.5 d,取得了良好的试验效果。研究表明,连续油管冲砂打捞砂埋节流器技术的可靠性和成功率高,具有较好的现场推广应用价值。
    Abstract: In order to solve the problem of gas well shutdown caused by the failure of fishing sand-buried throttles, a sand-burial identification method for throttles in gas wells was proposed on the basis of the structural principle of slip-type throttles. Then the complicated reasons for fishing sand-buried throttles were analyzed. Combining the throttle treatments in conventional steel wire fishing and coiled tubing milling fishing as well as pulling tubing strings, the technical ideas and operational processes for coiled tubing sand washing and sand-buried throttle fishing were studied. After that, tool string for sand washing and fishing were recommended, and the theoretical minimum sand washing displacement corresponding to the coiled tubing and its diameter was analyzed. Field test of 4 horizontal wells showed that the sand-buried ϕ88.9 mm throttles were fished after sand washing, with a success rate of 100%, and an average total time of less than 1.5 days. The research results show that this technology for sand washing and fishing the sand-buried throttles is reliable, with a high success rate and a high popularization value in field applications.
  • 图  1   卡瓦节流器结构

    1.打捞头;2.节流机构;3.卡瓦机构;4.密封胶筒;5.防砂机构

    Figure  1.   Structure of a slip-type throttle

    图  2   节流器砂埋和打捞示意

    Figure  2.   Sand burial and fishing of a throttle

    图  3   打捞工具串结构

    Figure  3.   Structure of fishing tool string

    图  4   打捞工具结构组成

    1.接头;2.锁定螺钉;3.弹簧;4.外筒;5.剪钉;6.矩形弹簧;7.滑块;8.中心管;9.打捞爪

    Figure  4.   Structural composition of fishing tool

    图  5   最小排量与砂粒直径的关系

    Figure  5.   Relationship between minimum displacement and sand diameter

    图  6   X-1水平气井井身结构

    Figure  6.   Casing program of horizontal gas Well X-1

    表  1   连续油管和钢丝的性能参数对比

    Table  1   Comparison of performance parameters of coiled tubing and steel wire

    打捞载体直径/mm上提力/kN下压力/kN除砂方式震击优势推荐
    连续油管38.1>100 000>5 000冲砂可同时冲砂、震击、打捞主要打捞方式
    钢丝 3.0<7 000自重捞砂具有完善的打捞工具系列辅助打捞方式
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   冲砂打捞技术参数

    Table  2   Technical parameters of sand washing and fishing

    井号节流器规格/
    mm
    铅印砂埋位置/
    m
    打捞位置/
    m
    油管内径/
    mm
    连续油管直径/
    mm
    泵压/
    MPa
    排量/
    (L·min–1)
    冲洗液打捞结果
    X-188.9 945.00 961.0076.038.129.0~32.0300~3200.2%胍胶钢丝打捞失败,连
    续油管打捞成功
    X-288.91 627.001 627.7076.038.121.0~31.2200~300清水钢丝打捞成功
    X-388.91 580.001 586.0076.050.822.0~23.0320~3400.2%胍胶连续油管打捞成功
    X-488.91 574.001 585.8076.050.825.0~27.0350~380清水连续油管打捞成功
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 肖述琴,卫亚明,杨旭东,等. 井下节流器用气举打捞工具研制与应用[J]. 石油矿场机械,2013,42 (2):46–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3482.2013.02.013

    XIAO Shuqin, WEI Yaming, YANG Xudong, et al. Development and application of gas lift fishing tool[J]. Petroleum Field Machinery, 2013, 42 (2): 46–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3482.2013.02.013

    [2] 李牧. 下倾型页岩气水平井连续油管排水采气工艺[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2020,42(3):329–333.

    LI Mu. Coiled tubing of drainage gas recovery technology used in shale-gas downdip horizontal wells[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(3): 329–333.

    [3] 石孝志,苏贵杰,王忠胜,等. 连续油管打捞技术在川渝地区的应用[J]. 天然气工业,2008,28(8):58–60. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.08.016

    SHI Xiaozhi, SU Guijie, WANG Zhongsheng, et al. Application ofcoiled tubing fishing technology in Sichuanand Chongqing Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(8): 58–60. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.08.016

    [4] 曹学军,周赟,傅伟,等. 连续油管带压作业技术在特殊复杂井况中的应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2012,35(2):50–52, 56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2012.02.014

    CAO Xuejun, ZHOU Yun, FU Wei, et al. Application of pressureoperation technology of coiled tubing in special complex well condition[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2012, 35(2): 50–52, 56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2012.02.014

    [5] 吴磊,何吉标,曹颖. 连续油管临时封井注水泥技术在涪陵页岩气田的应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2019,41(6):714–717.

    WU Lei, HE Jibiao, CAO Ying. Application of the coiled tubing based temporary well plugging and cementing technology in the Fuling Shale Gas Field[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 41(6): 714–717.

    [6] 陈路原. 泾河油田连续油管水力喷砂射孔环空多簇压裂技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2015,43(4):108–112.

    CHEN Luyuan. Technology of hydraulic sand blasting perforation and multiple clusters fracturing with coiled tubing in Jinghe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(4): 108–112.

    [7] 邹先雄,石孝志,董守涛. 打捞连续油管落鱼工艺技术研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺,2018,41(5):16–18, 22. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2018.05.05

    ZOU Xianxiong, SHI Xiaozhi, DONG shoutao. Study on how to fish coiled tubing and application[J]. Drilling & ProductionTechnology, 2018, 41(5): 16–18, 22. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2018.05.05

    [8] 艾白布·阿不力米提,庞德新,王一全,等. 连续油管打捞连续油管关键工具研究与应用[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019,47(6):89–95. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019117

    AIBAIBU Abulimit, PANG Dexin, WANG Yiquan, et al. The research and application of a key tool for coiled tubing fishing with coiled tubing[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(6): 89–95. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019117

    [9] 张宝,邵兵,郭新维,等. 超深井连续管作业过程受力分析及实例计算[J]. 石油机械,2013(8):59–63, 68.

    ZHANG Bao, SHAO Bing, GUO Xinwei, et al. Force analysis of CT operating process in superdeep well and example calculation[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2013(8): 59–63, 68.

    [10] 付刚旦,王晓荣,赵粉霞,等. 低压低产气井连续油管冲砂试验及分析[J]. 断块油气田,2007,14(1):77–79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8907.2007.01.030

    FU Gangdan, WANG Xiaorong, ZHAO Fenxia, et al. Test and analysis of coiled tubing sandwashingfor gas well[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2007, 14(1): 77–79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8907.2007.01.030

    [11] 逄仁德,崔莎莎,韩继勇,等. 水平井连续油管钻磨桥塞工艺研究与应用[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(1):57–62.

    PANG Rende, CUI Shasha, HAN Jiyong, et al. Research and application of drilling, milling-grinding techniques for drilling out composite bridge plugs in coiled tubing in horizontal wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(1): 57–62.

    [12]

    WILLIAMS C E J, BRUCE G H. Carrying capacity of drilling muds[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1951, 3(4): 111–120. doi: 10.2118/951111-G

    [13]

    DUAN Mingqin, MISKA S, YU Mengjiao, et al. Transport of small cuttings in extended-reach drilling[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2008, 23(3): 258–265.

    [14] 宋先知,李根生,王梦抒,等. 连续油管钻水平井岩屑运移规律数值模拟[J]. 石油钻探技术,2014,42(2):28–32.

    SONG Xianzhi, LI Gensheng, WANG Mengshu, et al. Numerical simulation on cuttings carrying regularity for horizontal wells drilled with coiled tubing[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(2): 28–32.

    [15] 李小龙,汤清源,徐云喜,等. 连续管流体循环作业下入特性研究[J]. 石油机械,2020,48(11):10–15.

    LI Xiaolong, TANG Qingyuan, XU Yunxi, et al. Research on the RIH behavior of coiled tubing under circulation operation[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2020, 48(11): 10–15.

    [16] 赵签,黄宏彬,王一全,等. 连续管反循环冲砂过程的磨损研究[J]. 石油机械,2020,48(9):107–113.

    ZHAO Qian, HUANG Hongbin, WANG Yiquan, et al. Study on abrasion of coiled tubing for reverse circulation sand washing[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2020, 48(9): 107–113.

    [17] 马东军,李根生,黄中伟,等. 连续油管侧钻径向水平井循环系统压耗计算模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(4):494–499.

    MA Dongjun, LI Gensheng, HUANG Zhongwei, et al. A model of calculating the circulating pressure loss in coiled tubing ultra-short radius radial drilling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 494–499.

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 张文锐,代玉杰,刘贵满. 环形井网稠油渗流压力场数值模拟. 当代化工. 2022(01): 196-201+205 . 百度学术
    2. 李瑞轩,黄云龙,李源. 油藏渗流模型与数值模拟技术研究进展. 石油化工应用. 2021(07): 11-15+29 . 百度学术
    3. 房娜,姜光宏,程奇,李广龙,王双龙. 裂缝性油藏不同见水模式下的注水优化. 断块油气田. 2020(05): 633-637 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

图(6)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  655
  • HTML全文浏览量:  391
  • PDF下载量:  131
  • 被引次数: 5
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-29
  • 修回日期:  2021-07-16
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-05-12
  • 刊出日期:  2021-10-17

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回