深井超深井短轻尾管短路故障测试方法与现场应用

刘国祥, 赵德利, 李振, 孔博

刘国祥, 赵德利, 李振, 孔博. 深井超深井短轻尾管短路故障测试方法与现场应用[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(5): 70-74. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021042
引用本文: 刘国祥, 赵德利, 李振, 孔博. 深井超深井短轻尾管短路故障测试方法与现场应用[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(5): 70-74. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021042
LIU Guoxiang, ZHAO Deli, LI Zhen, KONG Bo. Short Circuit Fault Test Method and Field Application of Short and Light Liners in Deep and Ultra-Deep Wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 70-74. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021042
Citation: LIU Guoxiang, ZHAO Deli, LI Zhen, KONG Bo. Short Circuit Fault Test Method and Field Application of Short and Light Liners in Deep and Ultra-Deep Wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(5): 70-74. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2021042

深井超深井短轻尾管短路故障测试方法与现场应用

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘国祥(1980—),男,山东德州人,2004年毕业于石油大学(华东)石油工程专业,2013年获中国石油大学(北京)石油与天然气工程专业硕士学位,高级工程师,主要从事固井完井工具及工艺技术研究。E-mail:lgx@shelfoil.com

  • 中图分类号: TE256+.4

Short Circuit Fault Test Method and Field Application of Short and Light Liners in Deep and Ultra-Deep Wells

  • 摘要: 为了精准测试深井超深井短轻尾管是否发生短路,在尾管短路常规测试方法的基础上,结合实际施工作业条件,提出了变密度浆体循环压力变化曲线测试方法,分析了变密度循环测试原理、控制过程,研究了可操作的测试流程与技术关键点。变密度浆体循环压力对井下循环通道变化具有较高的敏感性,反映在压力曲线上会有不同的压力变化,通过对比现场实测压力曲线与理论压力曲线,可准确判断井下管柱短路情况。现场应用表明,该测试方法具有抗干扰因素强、测试结果精准度高和现场操作简便的优点,能够准确判断尾管管柱是否发生短路。变密度浆体循环压力变化曲线测试方法解决了深井超深井短轻尾管短路测试难的问题,具有较好的现场推广应用价值。
    Abstract: To accurately test the short circuit of short and light liners in deep and ultra-deep wells, a test method for the circulating pressure curves of variable density slurry was proposed after analyzing conventional test methods for liner short circuits and considering actual construction conditions. The principle and control processes of variable density cyclic tests, operable test programs, and key technical points were studied. The circulating pressure of variable density slurry was highly sensitive to the changes in downhole circulation channels, shown in pressure curves as variations. The comparison between the measured and theoretical pressure curves can reveal the short circuit situation of downhole strings. Field application results prove the test method has the characteristics of strong anti-interference capability, accurate measurement results, and simple operation, which can correctly identify the short circuit of liner strings. The test method for the circulating pressure curves of variable density slurry has overcome the difficulty in testing the short and light liner short circuits in deep and ultra-deep wells, which is worthy of wide application.
  • 图  1   变密度浆体循环压力曲线测试原理

    Figure  1.   Test principle for the circulating pressure curves of variable density slurry

    图  2   循环压力–时间曲线

    Figure  2.   Curves of circulating pressure versus time

    表  1   西南地区10#井ϕ177.8 mm尾管循环迟到时间测试结果

    Table  1   Test results of the circulation lag time of ϕ177.8 mm liner in Well 10# of Soutuwest Area

    序号实测时间/
    min
    泵冲排量/
    (L·s−1
    指示物返出情况理论返出时间/min
    从井底从悬挂器
    11766221.0塑料条 107 min后出现第一片塑料条,109~116 min返出量增多263189
    21706622.8塑料条 153 min出现第一片塑料条,163~170 min返出量增多242174
    31209330.0塑料条、瓷片 120 min时见塑料条172123
    41079330.0瓜子、塑料条 64~77 min发现瓜子,107 min发现瓜子、塑料条;112~127 min返出物数量增多172123
    51319029.0塑料条、云母 109 min见第一片塑料片,121 min时共见22片;127 min见云母片,131 min见大量云母片,之后一直出174125
    61389229.7瓜子、塑料条 138 min见第一片塑料片;153 min时指示物增多,后零星出现瓜子和塑料条173125
    71679330.0密度1.80 kg/L
    的重浆16 m3
     162~167 min 钻井液密度变化,167~189 min 钻井液密度变化明显172123
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   变密度浆体循环测试压力控制表

    Table  2   Pressure control table for cyclic tests of variable density slurry

    循环井段替入量/m3内外静压差/MPa循环压力/MPa循环时间/min变密度浆体循环控制点
    钻杆内0 0 7.50 0开始进入ϕ139.7 mm钻杆
    8.50–4.0911.59 17.7全部进入ϕ139.7 mm钻杆
    30.28 –4.0911.59 80.8开始进入ϕ101.6 mm钻杆
    8.50–8.3415.84 98.5全部进入ϕ101.6 mm钻杆
    4.85–8.3415.84108.6开始进入ϕ139.7 mm套管
    套管底进环空5.00–5.8413.34119.0开始进入ϕ139.9 mm套管环空
    1.31–3.4110.91121.8开始进入环空ϕ193.7 mm套管
    1.65–0.53 8.03125.2开始进入ϕ101.6 mm钻杆环空
    0.54 0.20 7.30126.3全部进入ϕ139.9 mm套管
    5.00 4.49 3.01136.7全部进入ϕ139.9 mm套管环空
    尾管顶部短路进环空8.50 3.18 4.32126.3ϕ139.9 mm套管顶部全部进入钻套环空
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 马开华,谷磊,叶海超. 深层油气勘探开发需求与尾管悬挂器技术进步[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019,47(3):34–40. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019055

    MA Kaihua, GU Lei, YE Haichao. The demands on deep oil/gas exploration & development and the technical advancement of liner hangers[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 34–40. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019055

    [2] 郑晓志,徐明会,杜鹏德. 带胶塞系统可提出式回接装置在尾管补救固井中的应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2015,37(6):36–38.

    ZHENG Xiaozhi, XU Minghui, DU Pengde. Application of retrievable tie-back device of system with rubber plug in remedial cementing with liner[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015, 37(6): 36–38.

    [3] 张峰,刘子帅,李宁,等. 塔里木库车山前深井窄间隙小尾管固井技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(4):473–479, 485. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.014

    ZHANG Feng, LIU Zishuai, LI Ning, et al. Cementing small liner strings with narrow clearance in deep wells in the Kuche piedmont structure in Tarim Basin[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(4): 473–479, 485. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.014

    [4] 邓昌松,何思龙,段永贤,等. 复杂超深井KS1井四开尾管固井技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2019,41(6):708–713.

    DENG Changsong, HE Silong, DUAN Yongxian, et al. Fourth-section liner cementing technology used in the complex ultradeep Well KS1[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 41(6): 708–713.

    [5] 蒋希文.钻井事故与复杂问题[M].2版.北京: 石油工业出版社, 2006: 426–481.

    JIANG Xiwen. Drilling accident and complicated problems[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2006: 486–481.

    [6] 刘春文,沈海超,袁济华,等. 尾管固井短路复杂情况及其补救固井方案[J]. 中国海上油气,2013,25(3):53–56, 60.

    LIU Chunwen, SHEN Haichao, YUAN Jihua, et al. Handing of the circulation short circuit during liner cementing[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(3): 53–56, 60.

    [7] 费中明,高飞,蒋世伟,等. 柴达木盆地冷探1井尾管悬挂器丢手异常固井实践[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2020,42(5):606–609.

    FEI Zhongming, GAO Fei, JIANG Shiwei, et al. Cementing practice with abnormal release of liner hanger in Well Lengtan 1 in the Qaidam Basin[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(5): 606–609.

    [8] 丁士东,赵向阳. 中国石化重点探区钻井完井技术新进展与发展建议[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(4):11–20. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020069

    DING Shidong, ZHAO Xiangyang. New progress and development suggestions for drilling and completion technologies in Sinopec key exploration areas[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(4): 11–20. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020069

    [9] 邹书强,张红卫,伊尔齐木,等. 顺北一区超深井窄间隙小尾管固井技术研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019,47(6):60–66. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019114

    ZOU Shuqiang, ZHANG Hongwei, Yierqimu, et al. Slim liner cementing technology for ultra-deep wells with a narrow annulus in No. 1 District of Shunbei Block[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(6): 60–66. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019114

    [10] 沈海超,胡晓庆,王希玲,等. 监测井下循环情况的迟到时间法在固井中的应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2012,29(3):58–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2012.03.018

    SHEN Haichao, HU Xiaoqing, WANG Xiling, et al. Lag time method used in cementing[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2012, 29(3): 58–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2012.03.018

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 李新发,李婷,刘博峰,张峰,肖志明,王浩帆. 基于压裂监测的致密储层甜点识别. 断块油气田. 2020(05): 603-607 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

图(2)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  492
  • HTML全文浏览量:  221
  • PDF下载量:  90
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-10-24
  • 修回日期:  2021-07-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-04-27
  • 刊出日期:  2021-10-17

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回