Applicability of a New Device for Cementing Flushing Fluid Evaluation
-
摘要: 为了明确新型固井冲洗液评价装置的适用范围，根据评价装置内筒外壁面处与固井环空壁面剪切速率相等的原理，结合罗伯逊-斯蒂夫流变模式推导了冲洗液为牛顿、宾汉和幂律流体时其在内筒外壁处剪切速率的计算公式，并分析了不同流变模式冲洗液内筒外壁面处剪切速率与固井环空壁面剪切速率的误差。分析结果为：当冲洗液为牛顿流体时，评价装置在内筒外壁面处的剪切速率与固井界面处相等，不存在理论误差；当冲洗液为宾汉和幂律流体时，评价装置内筒外壁面处的剪切速率大于固井界面处，且剪切速率增量与内外筒间隙和冲洗液流变性质有关；当评价装置外内筒半径比限定在1.04~1.20时，冲洗液为幂律流体且流性指数大于0.6或为宾汉流体且动塑比小于1 Pa/（mPa·s）时，剪切速率相对误差在10%以内。研究结果表明，评价装置外内筒半径比越小，相对误差越小，其适用范围越大。Abstract: To clarify the application scope of an innovative evaluation device for cementing flushing fluid, a calculation model for shear rates of Newtonian, Bingham and power-law fluids on external wall of the inner barrel was established in accordance with the Robertson-Stiff rheological model and with consideration to the equivalent shear rate on external wall of the inner barrel and on annular sidewall in cementing. In addition, errors between the shear rate of the external sidewall of inner barrel and that of cementing annual sidewall under different rheological modes was analyzed. Research results showed that the shear rate at the inner wall of the device is equal to that at the cementing interface with no theoretical error for Newtonian fluids, while the shear rate of the inner cylinder wall is higher than that on the cementing interface, and the increase in shear rates is related to the inner and outer cylinder gap and rheological properties of the flushing fluids for Bingham and the power-law fluids. When the diameter ratio between the outer and inner barrel is 1.04-1.20 and the flushing power-law fluid flow indexes over 0.6, or plastic viscosity below 1.0 Pa/(mPa·s) for Bingham fluid, their relative error in the shear rate can be maintained less than 10%. Research results show the smaller ratio between external and internal barrels diameter would cause less relative error, and the application scope of the device would be more extensive.
-
Keywords:
- cementing /
- flushing fluid /
- evaluation device /
- applicability /
- rheological mode
-
-
[1] LU S,FOXENBERG W E.Double-emulsion spacer design for highly efficient invert emulsion[R].SPE 151604,2012.
[2] MASERATI G,DATURI E,DEL GAUDIO L,et al.Nano-emulsions as cement spacer improve the cleaning of casing bore during cementing operations[R].SPE 133033,2010.
[3] OSODE P I,OTAIBI M A,EL-KILANY K A,et al.Evaluation of nonreactive aqueous spacer fluids for oil-based mud displacement in open hole horizontal wells[R].SPE 161914,2012.
[4] ARANHA P E,MIRANDA C R,CARDOSO W F,et al.A comprehensive theoretical and experimental study on fluid displacement for oilwell cementing operations[R].SPE 150276,2012.
[5] CARRASQUILLA J,GUILLOT D J,ALI S A,et al.Microemulsion technology for synthetic-based mud removal in well cementing operations[R].SPE 156313,2012.
[6] 张明霞,向兴金,童志能,等.水泥浆前置液评价方法总论[J].钻采工艺,2002,25(6):81-83. ZHANG Mingxia,XIANG Xingjin,TONG Zhineng,et al.General narration of the evaluation approach to the slurry’s prepad fluid[J].Drilling Production Technology,2002,25(6):81-83. [7] 王乐顶,王长在,喻芬,等.固井冲洗液室内模拟评价方法研究[J].探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2014,41(10):54-57. WANG Leding,WANG Changzai,YU Fen,et al.Research on evaluation method of laboratory simulation of cementing flushing fluid[J].Exploration Engineering(Rock Soil Drilling and Tunneling),2014,41(10):54-57. [8] 西南石油大学,中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司.一种基于剪切速率相等原理的固井冲洗液评价装置:201320710678.X[P].2014-05-14. Southwest Petroleum University,CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited.Well cementation flushing fluid evaluating device based on shearing rate equivalence principle:201320710678.X[P].2014-05-14. [9] 西南石油大学,中国石油集团渤海钻探工程有限公司.一种基于剪切速率相等原理的固井冲洗液评价装置及方法:201310562538[P].2014-01-29. Southwest Petroleum University,CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited.An apparatus and method was evaluated based on the principle of cementing a shear rate equal to rinse:201310562538[P].2014-01-29. [10] SAASEN A,SVANES K,OMLAND T H,et al.Well cleaning performance[R].SPE 87204,2004.
[11] 李克文,沈平平.原油与浆体流变学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:22-105. LI Kewen,SHEN Pingping.Rheology of crude oil and slurry[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:22-105. [12] 王乐顶.页岩气水平井固井前置液体系研究及应用[D].西南石油大学,2014. WANG Leding.Research and application of flushing fluid for shale gas horizontal well cementing[D].Southwest Petroleum University,2014. -
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 罗建新，赵茂林，张烈辉，刘继柱，范梓煊. 基于产量损失率的气井合理配产方法研究. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 89-96 . 
百度学术
2. 徐凤银，聂志宏，孙伟，熊先钺，徐博瑞，张雷，时小松，刘莹，刘世瑞，赵增平，王渊，黄红星，林海鲲. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气高效开发理论技术体系. 煤炭学报. 2024(01): 528-544 . 百度学术
3. 沈金才. 页岩气井邻井压裂干扰响应特征及机理探讨：以涪陵页岩气田为例. 地质科技通报. 2024(04): 87-97 . 百度学术
4. 汤亚顽. 页岩气开发调整区生产特征及产能影响因素. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2023(03): 8-10+16 . 百度学术
5. 漆世伟，翟中波，王波，杨卫刚. 基于多参数测量柱塞的井底流压连续监测及应用. 中外能源. 2023(10): 62-66 . 百度学术
6. 房大志，马伟竣，谷红陶，卢比，胡春锋. 南川区块平桥地区页岩气井生产阶段划分与合理生产方式研究. 油气藏评价与开发. 2022(03): 477-486 . 百度学术
7. 蔡勋育，赵培荣，高波，朱彤，田玲珏，孙川翔. 中国石化页岩气“十三五”发展成果与展望. 石油与天然气地质. 2021(01): 16-27 . 百度学术
8. 沈金才，董长新，常振. 涪陵页岩气田气井生产阶段划分及动态特征描述. 天然气勘探与开发. 2021(01): 111-117 . 百度学术
9. 周玉萍，杨文新，郑爱维，梁榜. 页岩气衰竭开采规律影响因素室内模拟. 天然气勘探与开发. 2021(04): 115-122 . 百度学术
10. 陈筱琳. 页岩气完井管柱下入时机分析. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2020(03): 21-23 . 百度学术
11. 崔传智，尹帆，李立峰，冯绪波. 水驱油藏产量递减评价方法. 断块油气田. 2019(05): 605-608 . 百度学术
12. 邓佳琪. 一种确定页岩气井合理配产的方法. 江汉石油职工大学学报. 2018(05): 48-51 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 19705
- HTML全文浏览量: 138
- PDF下载量: 15430
- 被引次数: 15
下载:
