塔河油田高温高盐油藏氮气泡沫调驱技术

李亮, 张建军, 马淑芬, 伍亚军, 巫光胜, 郭娜

李亮, 张建军, 马淑芬, 伍亚军, 巫光胜, 郭娜. 塔河油田高温高盐油藏氮气泡沫调驱技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(5): 94-99. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201605016
引用本文: 李亮, 张建军, 马淑芬, 伍亚军, 巫光胜, 郭娜. 塔河油田高温高盐油藏氮气泡沫调驱技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(5): 94-99. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201605016
LI Liang, ZHANG Jianjun, MA Shufen, WU Yajun, WU Guangsheng, GUO Na. Profile Control and Displacement Technique with N2 Foam in High-Temperature and High-Salinity Reservoirs of the Tahe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(5): 94-99. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201605016
Citation: LI Liang, ZHANG Jianjun, MA Shufen, WU Yajun, WU Guangsheng, GUO Na. Profile Control and Displacement Technique with N2 Foam in High-Temperature and High-Salinity Reservoirs of the Tahe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(5): 94-99. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.201605016

塔河油田高温高盐油藏氮气泡沫调驱技术

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李亮(1984-),男,江苏连云港人,2006年毕业于大庆石油学院化学专业,2009年获中国石油大学(北京)应用化学专业硕士学位,工程师,主要从事调剖堵水及三次采油方面的研究工作。

  • 中图分类号: TE357.46+9

Profile Control and Displacement Technique with N2 Foam in High-Temperature and High-Salinity Reservoirs of the Tahe Oilfield

  • 摘要: 为降低塔河油田边底水高温高盐油藏的含水率,提高产油量,进行了氮气泡沫调驱技术研究。通过评价耐温耐盐发泡剂的性能,优选出了适用于塔河油田高温高盐油藏的发泡剂,并通过室内岩心驱替试验,分析了泡沫注入时机、注入量、注入方式对氮气泡沫调驱效果的影响。结果表明:发泡剂GD-2在130℃下,210 000 mg/L矿化度的情况下,老化10 d后的半衰期可以维持在850 s,耐温耐盐性能较好,适合在塔河油田使用;水驱至含水率为80%~90%时,注入氮气泡沫采收率提高幅度最大;氮气泡沫的注入量为0.5倍孔隙体积时,采收率提高幅度最大;段塞方式注入氮气泡沫的采收率提高幅度比连续注入方式和气液交替注入方式大。塔河油田TK202H井组的现场试验表明:注入氮气泡沫进行调驱后,3口生产井的产油量得到提高,含水率得到降低。这表明,塔河油田边底水高温高盐油藏采用氮气泡沫调驱技术可以降低含水率,提高油井产量。
    Abstract: To reduce water cut and enhance the oil production of high-temperature and high-salinity (HTHS) reservoirs with edge or bottom water in the Tahe Oilfield, the applicability of profile control and displacement technique with N2 foam was discussed. Through evaluation, HTHS-resistant foaming agents suitable for the HTHS reservoirs in the Tahe Oilfield were selected. Through core displacement tests in the laboratory, the impacts of timing, volume and mode of foam injection on the performance of the proposed technique were investigated. Results show that foaming agent GD-2 demonstrated satisfactory performance under 130℃ and a salinity of 210,000 mg/L with a half-life of 850 seconds after aging for 10 days. In addition, the highest increase in recovery could be achieved by foam flooding with a water cut of 80%-90% in water flooding. The highest increase in recovery was also observed by foam flooding with a volume of injected foam at 0.5 PV. Intermittent injection exhibited better performances than continuous injection and alternative injection of gas and liquid. Field application in TK202H cluster wells demonstrated that all three producers had a higher output and water cut reduction after profile control and displacement with N2 foam. In conclusion, the proposed profile control and displacement technique with N2 foam can effectively reduce water cut and enhance oil production in HTHS reservoirs with edge/bottom water in the Tahe Oilfield.
  • [1]

    WANG Demin,CHENG Jiecheng,WU Junzheng,et al.Summary of ASP pilots in Daqing Oilfield[R].SPE 57288,1999.

    [2] 胡小东,侯明明,胡文庭.超低界面张力表面活性剂体系的研究及应用[J].吐哈油气,2011,16(2):156-158. HU Xiaodong,HOU Mingming,HU Wenting.Study and application of ultra-low interfacial tension surfactants[J].Tuha Oil Gas,2011,16(2):156-158.
    [3]

    FULCHER R A Jr,ERTEKIN T,STAHL C D.Effect of capillary number and its constituents on two-phase relative permeability curves[R].SPE 12170,1985.

    [4] 李秋,杜建芬,郭平.新型抗高温高盐泡沫体系性能测试与评价[J].重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2011,13(2):9-11. LI Qiu,DU Jianfen,GUO Ping.Performance test and evaluation of the new type foam system against high salinity and high temperature[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition),2011,13(2):9-11.
    [5]

    YIN Guoqiang,GRIGG R B,SVEC Y.Oil recovery and surfactant adsorption during CO2-foam flooding[R].OTC 19787,2009.

    [6] 李雪松.无碱低张力泡沫复合驱油体系室内试验研究[J].石油天然气学报,2009,31(1):130-133,150. LI Xuesong.Laboratory study on foam combination flooding system without alkali and low interfacial tension[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,31(1):130-133,150.
    [7] 李干佐,林元,王秀文,等.Tween80表面活性剂复合驱油体系研究[J].油田化学,1994,11(2):152-156. LI Ganzuo,LIN Yuan,WANG Xiuwen,et al.A new ASP-flooding solution of nonionic surfactant Tween-80 for the pilot test[J].Oilfield Chemistry,1994,11(2):152-156.
    [8]

    BERNARD G C,HOLM L W,HARVEY C P.Use of surfactant to reduce CO2 mobility in oil displacement[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1980,20(4):281-292.

    [11] 李兆敏,孙茂盛,林日亿,等.泡沫封堵及选择性分流实验研究[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):115-118. LI Zhaomin,SUN Maocheng,LIN Riyi,et al.Laboratory study on foam plugging and selective divided-flow[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(4):115-118.
    [12] 赵淑霞,彭彦素,于红军,等.氮气泡沫驱提高高渗透特高含水油藏采收率技术:以梁家楼油田纯56块为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(2):74-76. ZHAO Shuxia,PENG Yansu,YU Hongjun,et al.N2 foaming EOR for high permeable and high water cut reservoir:case of Block Chun56,Liangjialou Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(2):74-76.
    [13] 姜瑞忠,杨仁锋.涠洲11-4油田泡沫驱提高采收率可行性论证[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(2):49-51. JIANG Ruizhong,YANG Renfeng.Feasibility analysis of EOR by foam flooding in Weizhou 1-14 Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(2):49-51.
    [14] 张星,赵金省,张明,等.氮气泡沫在多孔介质中的封堵特性及其影响因素研究[J].石油与天然气化工,2009,38(3):227-230. ZHANG Xing,ZHAO Jinsheng,ZHANG Ming,et al.Study on blocking ability and influential factors of N2 foam in porous media[J].Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas,2009,38(3):227-230.
  • 期刊类型引用(7)

    1. 张景富,秦南欣欣,公海峰,王建成,谢帅,朱胡佳. 变井径环空分形表征及其对固井顶替效率的影响. 东北石油大学学报. 2023(03): 56-68+9-10 . 百度学术
    2. 贾佳,夏忠跃,冯雷,解健程. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密气水平井固井顶替效率影响因素. 天然气技术与经济. 2021(01): 45-49 . 百度学术
    3. 吴天乾,李明忠,李建新,李德红,张军义,何斌斌. 杭锦旗地区正注反挤固井技术研究. 钻采工艺. 2021(03): 104-107 . 百度学术
    4. 柳进. 探讨影响固井注水泥顶替效率的主要问题及其研究进展. 中国石油和化工标准与质量. 2020(02): 36-37 . 百度学术
    5. 杨红歧,陈会年,邓天安,李小江,魏浩光. 元坝气田超深探井小尾管防气窜固井技术. 石油钻采工艺. 2020(05): 592-599 . 百度学术
    6. 刘大伟,王绮,刘全稳,胡罡,李秀妹. 深井固井风险及防控方法研究. 广东石油化工学院学报. 2019(06): 1-4 . 百度学术
    7. 薛亮,陈博,樊林栋,周仕明,张晋凯,方春飞. 钻井液静切力对水平段固井顶替界面影响规律研究. 钻采工艺. 2017(03): 26-29+8-9 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(4)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  6900
  • HTML全文浏览量:  108
  • PDF下载量:  9124
  • 被引次数: 11
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-11-01
  • 修回日期:  2016-06-30
  • 刊出日期:  1899-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回