The Functional Mechanism of Drilling Tool Shoulder under Complex Load Conditions
-
摘要: 为了解台肩对钻具接头螺纹牙承载的影响，基于φ139.7 mm贯眼扣钻具接头分别建立了无台肩、仅主台肩、仅副台肩和双台肩等4种结构钻具接头的有限元计算模型，分析比较了其在复杂载荷作用下的力学特性和抗扭性能。分析结果表明：主、副台肩对保证钻具接头连接稳定性有着至关重要的作用；预紧扭矩作用下主台肩的存在使钻具接头公扣产生拉伸的预紧效果，副台肩的存在使钻具接头公扣产生压缩的预紧效果，从而直接影响了钻具接头的承载特征和极限抗扭能力；在相同轴向拉力的条件下，仅副台肩钻具接头的极限抗扭能力比仅主台肩钻具接头高约12%，双台肩钻具接头的极限抗扭能力比仅主台肩钻具接头高约69%。研究结果为新型高性能钻具接头的研发及结构设计提供了理论依据。Abstract: To clarify the effects of the shoulder on the load bearing of connection threads, FEM models are built based on φ139.7 mm FH connection under four conditions, i.e. no shoulder, only primary shoulder, only secondary shoulder and double shoulders, respectively, and analyzed the mechanical properties under complex loads. Research results showed that the primary and secondary shoulders could play vital roles for ensuring the stability while making up connections; the primary shoulder can make the pin connection generating tensile effects under pre-tightening torsion, whereas the secondary shoulder can make the pin connection produce compressive pre-tightening effects, which, eventually, will affect the load bearing characteristics and ultimate torsion resistance. Under the same axial tension, the ultimate torsion resistance with only secondary shoulder is 12% higher than that when it has only primary shoulder, whereas the double-shoulder connection is 69% higher than when it has only a primary shoulder connection. Research results could provide references for development and the structure design of a new high-performance drilling tool connections.
-
-
[1] 白鹤,何石磊,党涛,等.我国油套管特殊螺纹接头研究现状分析[J].焊管,2011,34(11):30-34.BAI He,HE Shilei,DANG Tao,et al.The analysis of research status on China domestic tubing and casing premium connection[J].Welded Pipe and Tube,2011,34(11):30-34. [2] 陈锋.复杂载荷条件下钻具接头三维应力特征分析[D].上海:上海大学,2014:42-56.CHEN Feng.Three-dimensional stress analysis of tool joints under complex load[D].Shanghai:Shanghai University,2014:42-56. [3] SANTUS C,BERTINI L,BEGHINI M,et al.Torsional strength comparison between two assembling techniques for aluminium drill pipe to steel tool joint connection[J].International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2009,86(2/3):177-186.
[4] XU Honglin,SHI Taihe,ZHANG Zhi,et al.Loading and contact stress analysis on the thread teeth in tubing and casing premium threaded connection[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2014,Article ID 287076.
[5] 许志倩,闫相祯,杨秀娟.非API标准Big Omega特殊螺纹接头连接性能数值分析[J].石油矿场机械,2009,38(6):34-39.XU Zhiqian,YAN Xiangzhen,YANG Xiujuan.Numerical analysis on connection performance of non-API Big Omega premium-threaded connection[J].Oil Field Equipment,2009,38(6):34-39. [6] 祝效华,董亮亮,童华,等.拉弯复合载荷作用下的API短圆套管螺纹力学行为[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):157-163.ZHU Xiaohua,DONG Liangliang,TONG Hua,et al.Mechanical behaviors of short-round thread of the API casing under combined load of stretching and bending moment[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):157-163. [7] KANTARIYA S N.FEM analysis application to the strength prediction challenges and design optimization of the casing string threaded connections[D].Aberdeen:The Robert Gordon University,School of Engineering MSc Oil and Gas Engineering,2007.
[8] TAFRESHI A,DOVER W D.Stress analysis of drillstring threaded connections using the finite element method[J].International Journal of Fatigue,1995,15(5):429-438.
[9] 祝效华,高原,贾彦杰.弯矩载荷作用下偏梯形套管连接螺纹参量敏感性分析[J].工程力学,2012,29(10):301-307.ZHU Xiaohua,GAO Yuan,JIA Yanjie,The parameter sensitivity analysis of buttress casing connecting thread under action of bending loading[J].Engineering Mechanics,2012,29(10):301-307. [10] RHEE H C.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of threaded joint:the 9th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,Houston,February 18-23,1990[C].
[11] 刘巨保,丁宇奇,韩礼红.基于三维有限元模型的钻具连接螺纹上扣扭矩影响分析[J].石油矿场机械,2009,38(3):28-32.LIU Jubao,DING Yuqi,HAN Lihong.Impact analysis of make-up torque of drill connecting thread based on 3-D finite element model[J].Oil Field Equipment,2009,38(3):28-32. [12] 陈锋,狄勤丰,欧阳彦辉,等.双台肩钻杆接头副台肩间隙的优选[J].工程力学,2013,30(增刊1):353-357.CHEN Feng,DI Qinfeng,OUYANG Yanhui et al.The influence of clearance of secondary shoulder on performance of double shoulder drill pipe joint[J].Engineering Mechanics,2013,30(supplement 1):353-357. [13] SHAHANI A R,SHARIFI S.Contact stress analysis and calculation of stress concentration factors at the tool joint of a drill pipe[J].MaterialsDesign,2009,30(9):3615-3621.
[14] 陈锋,狄勤丰,王文昌,等.基于密封性能要求的超深井钻柱极限提升力的确定[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1176-1180.CHEN Feng,DI Qinfeng,WANG Wenchang,et al.Determination of ultimate lifting capacity of drill string for ultra-deep wells based on sealing performance of tool joint[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1176-1180. -
期刊类型引用(26)
1. 史璨，林伯韬，谢勃勃，潘玉婷，张家豪. 基于双甜点的页岩储层可压性评价方法. 深圳大学学报(理工版). 2024(02): 183-191 . 
百度学术
2. 刘尧文，卞晓冰，李双明，蒋廷学，张驰. 基于应力反演的页岩可压性评价方法. 石油钻探技术. 2022(01): 82-88 . 本站查看
3. 蒋廷学，路保平，左罗，卞晓冰. 页岩气地质—工程可压度评价方法研究及应用. 天然气与石油. 2022(04): 68-74 . 百度学术
4. 张文康. 长庆油田陇东地区页岩油水平井细分切割压裂技术. 石化技术. 2022(12): 139-141 . 百度学术
5. 周桦，魏力民，王同，王岩，庞河清，张天操. 威荣深层页岩气储层精细评价方法及应用. 油气藏评价与开发. 2021(02): 42-49 . 百度学术
6. 蒋廷学，卞晓冰，左罗，沈子齐，刘建坤，吴春方. 非常规油气藏体积压裂全生命周期地质工程一体化技术. 油气藏评价与开发. 2021(03): 297-304+339 . 百度学术
7. 李杉杉，孙虎，张冕，池晓明，刘欢. 长庆油田陇东地区页岩油水平井细分切割压裂技术. 石油钻探技术. 2021(04): 92-98 . 本站查看
8. 牛卫涛，朱斗星，蒋立伟，韩冰，张文萍，周川江. 复杂山地页岩气藏“甜点”综合评价技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区为例. 天然气地球科学. 2021(10): 1546-1558 . 百度学术
9. 董岩，徐东升，钱根葆，王晓辉，戴云捷. 吉木萨尔页岩油“甜点”预测方法. 特种油气藏. 2020(03): 54-59 . 百度学术
10. 李旻翾，孙敬，胡佳妮，刘德华，袁博. 基于组合权重法的页岩气水平井段评价模型及其应用. 数学的实践与认识. 2020(13): 90-98 . 百度学术
11. 刘建坤，蒋廷学，卞晓冰，苏瑗，刘世华，魏娟明. 常压页岩气低成本高效压裂技术对策. 钻井液与完井液. 2020(03): 377-383 . 百度学术
12. 李旻翾，孙敬，胡佳妮，刘德华，袁博. 页岩气水平井段甜点优选模型. 科学技术与工程. 2020(24): 9844-9850 . 百度学术
13. 邓宇，陈胜，欧阳永林，曾庆才，苏旺，管全中. 川西南威远地区页岩气效益“甜点区”地震综合预测方法及其应用. 大庆石油地质与开发. 2019(02): 112-122 . 百度学术
14. 董振国. 页岩气水平井储集层追踪和评价关键技术. 录井工程. 2019(01): 43-51+138 . 百度学术
15. 苏瑗，蒋廷学，卞晓冰，周珺. 一种页岩气井压后评估的远井可压指数评价方法. 石油化工应用. 2019(05): 43-48 . 百度学术
16. 曾晓平. 王广浩地区盐间页岩油地震预测方法研究和应用. 内蒙古石油化工. 2019(06): 101-104 . 百度学术
17. 曾义金. 深层页岩气开发工程技术进展. 石油科学通报. 2019(03): 233-241 . 百度学术
18. 曾晓平. 王广浩地区盐间页岩油地震预测方法研究和应用. 江汉石油科技. 2018(01): 19-25 . 百度学术
19. 曾庆才，陈胜，贺佩，杨青，郭晓龙，陈鹏，代春萌，李璇，盖少华，邓宇，侯华星. 四川盆地威远龙马溪组页岩气甜点区地震定量预测. 石油勘探与开发. 2018(03): 406-414 . 百度学术
20. 路保平，丁士东. 中国石化页岩气工程技术新进展与发展展望. 石油钻探技术. 2018(01): 1-9 . 本站查看
21. 翟文宝，李军，周英操，柳贡慧，黄涛，宋学锋. 基于测井资料的页岩储层可压裂性评价新方法. 岩性油气藏. 2018(03): 112-123 . 百度学术
22. ZENG Qingcai，CHEN Sheng，HE Pei，YANG Qing，GUO Xiaolong，CHEN Peng，DAI Chunmeng，LI Xuan，GAI Shaohua，DENG Yu，HOU Huaxing. Quantitative prediction of shale gas sweet spots based on seismic data in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Weiyuan area, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2018(03): 422-430 . 必应学术
23. 郭盛强，苏中良，何庆宏，张子珂，李想. 碎软煤层穿层压裂的层段优选方法研究. 煤矿安全. 2018(11): 155-159+163 . 百度学术
24. 廖勇，谭判，石文睿，冯爱国，何浩然. 涪陵页岩气储层产气性评价方法. 石油钻探技术. 2018(05): 69-75 . 本站查看
25. 马文礼，李治平，高闯，孙玉平，张静平，邓思哲. 页岩气井初期产能主控因素“Pearson-MIC”分析方法. 中国科技论文. 2018(15): 1765-1771 . 百度学术
26. 徐春碧，肖晖，杨德普，巴悦. 利用综合甜点对YDN地区龙马溪组页岩储层进行可压性评价. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版). 2017(06): 1-4 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(17)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3893
- HTML全文浏览量: 120
- PDF下载量: 4657
- 被引次数: 43
下载:
