Evaluation Methods for Initial Productivity of Directional Wells in Offshore Fault Block Oilfields
-
摘要: 为确定DST测试法评价海上断块油田产能时的测试时间校正系数和边界校正系数大小,建立了不同边界断层定向井不稳定产能方程,并对其进行无因次化,获得了不同断层条件下油井无因次采油指数随时间变化的曲线,得到测试时间校正系数图版和不同断层距离及夹角的校正系数图版。机理分析表明,断块油田定向井产能综合校正系数为0.60~0.80,并且校正系数随测试时间不同而不同。海上2口生产井实例计算分析结果表明,利用理论图版分析各井产能综合校正系数与实际生产动态数据验证综合校正系数基本吻合,验证了产能综合校正系数图版的可靠性。研究结果表明,不同边界类型定向井DST测试产能校正系数与测试时间、边界距离呈指数递减趋势,可利用产能综合校正系数图版为海上短时DST测试法评价产能确定准确的综合校正系数。Abstract: To quantitatively determine the testing time and boundary correction factor of productivity evaluation with DSTs in oilfields with faults, unstable productivity equations were developed under different boundary conditions, and dimensionless oil production index curves were obtained. esting time and its correction factor under different fault distance and angle were derived.It was demonstrated that the productivity correction factor was roughly between 0.60-0.80 in this oilfield, and the correction factor varied over testing time.The example results from two production wells demonstrated that the theoretical analysis productivity correction factor was verified by the actual production dynamic data. Further it also verified the reliability of productivity correction factor charts.It concluded that the productivity correction factor under different boundary conditions decreased with testing time and boundary distance.Operators can use charts with productivity correction coefficients to determine the correction factor for offshore oil well productivity evaluation.
-
Keywords:
- testing time /
- productivity /
- fault block oilfield /
- DST /
- correction factor
-
-
[1] 李波, 罗宪波, 刘英, 等.海上稠油油田合理单井产能预测新方法[J].中国海上油气, 2008, 20(4):243-245. Li Bo, Luo Xianbo, Liu Ying, et al.A new method to predict reasonable deliverability of individual wells in offshore heavy oilfields[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2008, 20(4):243-245. [2] 罗宪波, 赵春明, 刘英.海上稠油油田投产初期产能评价研究[J].断块油气田, 2011, 18(5):630-633. Luo Xianbo, Zhao Chunming, Liu Ying.Study on deliverability evaluation of offshore heavy oi1 field at initial stage of production[J].Fault-Block Oil Gas Field, 2011, 18 (5):630-633. [3] 毛志强, 李进福.油气层产能预测方法及模型[J].石油学报, 2000, 21(5):8-11. Mao Zhiqiang, Li Jinfu.Reservoir productivity prediction method and model[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(5):8-11. [4] 马奎前, 刘英宪, 苏彦春.渤海S油田高含水期加密井产能评价[J].断块油气田, 2013, 20(1):71-73. Ma Kuiqian, Liu Yingxian, Su Yanchun.Productivity evaluation of infill well at high water cut stage in S Oilfield, Bohai Bay[J].Fault-Block Oil Gas Field, 2013, 20(1):71-73. [5] 罗远儒, 陈勉, 金衍, 等.水平井不同产能计算方法探讨[J].断块油气田, 2012, 19(1):95-98. Luo Yuanru, Chen Mian, Jin Yan, et al.Discussion on different calculation methods of productivity for horizontal well[J].Fault-Block Oil Gas Field, 2012, 19(1):95-98. [6] 廖新维, 沈平平.现代试井分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2002:107-115. Liao Xinwei, Shen Pingping.Modern well test analysis[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002:107-115. [7] Van Everdingen A F, Hurst W.The application of Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1949, 1(12):305-324.
[8] Fikri J Kuchuk.Radius of investigation for reserve estimation from pressure transient well[R].SPE 120515, 1987.
[9] 张雁.利用不稳定产能评价检验试井解释参数合理性[J].油气井测试, 2007, 16(1):20-22. Zhang Yan.By using unsteady productivity evaluation method to check rationality of well testing interpreting parameter[J].Well Testing, 2007, 16(1):20-22. [10] 陈淑芳.用不稳定试井确定产能方程的新方法[J].天然气工业, 1994, 14(4):55-57. Chen Shufang.A new way to determine capacity equation by unstable testing[J].Natural Gas Industry, 1994, 14(4):20-22. [11] 余碧君, 毛伟, 王春瑞.应用地层测试流动段资料确定油井稳定产能方法研究[J].油气井测试, 2003, 12(2):9-11. Yu Bijun, Mao Wei, Wang Chunrui.A method study for predicting oil well steady-state deliverability by applying formation testing flow period data[J].Well Testing, 2003, 12(2):9-11. [12] 林学春, 刘立志, 汪芸, 等.测试资料在张海5 断块产能和储层评价中应用[J].油气井测试, 2012, 21(3):17-19. Lin Xuechun, Liu Lizhi, Wang Yun, et al.Application of test data in production and reservoir evaluation for Zhanghai 5 Fault Block[J].Well Testing, 2012, 21(3):17-19. [13] 李传亮.油藏工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2005:239-252. Li Chuanliang.Oil reservoir engineering[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2005:239-252. [14] 王新海, 夏位荣.不稳定试井边界效应分析[J].油气井测试, 1994, 4(4):25-28. Wang Xinhai, Xia Weirong.Unstable testing boundary effect analysis[J].Well Testing, 1994, 4(4):25-28. [15] 王新海, 谢又新, 张延星.调查半径与地层损害表皮系数的关系[J].钻采工艺, 2002, 25(4):25-27. Wang Xinhai, Xie Youxin, Zhang Yanxing.The relation between radius of investigation and formation damage[J].Drilling Production Technology, 2002, 25(4):25-27. [16] 杨同玉, 张福仁, 邓广渝.应用DST测试资料研究油井损害半径和渗透率的新方法[J].油气采收率技术, 1996, 3(2):42-46. Yang Tongyu, Zhang Furen, Deng Guangyu.A new method for studying well damage radius and permeability from drillstem test(DST) data[J].Oil Gas Recovery Technology, 1996, 3(2):42-46. [17] 刘能强.实用现代试井解释方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2008:142-168. Liu Nengqiang.Practical modern well test interpretation method[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008:142-168. -
期刊类型引用(9)
1. 秦才会，卢华涛，朱玉宁，曹云风，杨阳. 某盖板式随钻测井仪器井下泄漏失效分析与结构优化. 钻探工程. 2023(02): 39-46 . 
百度学术
2. 朱祖扬. 随钻单极子声波测井模式优化及远探测. 应用声学. 2022(02): 310-317 . 百度学术
3. 刘西恩，孙志峰，仇傲，李杰，罗博，彭凯旋，罗瑜林. 随钻四极子声波测井仪的设计及试验. 石油钻探技术. 2022(03): 125-131 . 本站查看
4. 孙志峰，仇傲，金亚，李杰，罗博，彭凯旋. 随钻多极子声波测井仪接收声系的优化设计与试验. 石油钻探技术. 2022(04): 114-120 . 本站查看
5. 李杰，刘西恩，罗博，孙志峰，仇傲，罗瑜林. 国产随钻单极声波测井仪的设计及应用. 石油管材与仪器. 2022(06): 38-43 . 百度学术
6. 王军，聂成洋，侯许佳，关威，张超. 单极源钻铤波传播机制的实验研究2. 地球物理学报. 2021(05): 1797-1810 . 百度学术
7. 马海，李铮阳，肖红兵. 随钻声波测井仪模拟实验装置研制及应用. 内蒙古石油化工. 2019(07): 1-5 . 百度学术
8. 李丰波，陆黄生，李根生，张卫. 可相控声波高压激励系统设计. 高技术通讯. 2018(05): 468-471 . 百度学术
9. 米金泰，周珺，朱祖扬，李新，李丰波. 随钻声波仪器刻槽钻铤结构分析. 石油化工应用. 2018(02): 58-62 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3778
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 4631
- 被引次数: 14
下载:
