基于微电阻率成像测井的地层各向异性表征方法

胡文亮; 张国栋; 刘保银; 罗健; 魏晓晗

doi:10.11911/syztjs.2023048

基于微电阻率成像测井的地层各向异性表征方法

1.
中海石油（中国）有限公司上海分公司, 上海 200335
2.
杭州迅美科技有限公司, 浙江杭州 310012

基金项目: 中海石油（中国）有限公司上海分公司七年行动计划科技项目“西湖凹陷西部地区勘探开发关键技术研究”（编号：CNOOC-KJ 135 ZDXM 39 SH01）资助

详细信息

作者简介:
胡文亮（1988—），男，湖北孝感人，2014年毕业于长江大学地球探测与信息技术专业，工程师，主要从事测井处理与解释工作。E-mail：huwl5@cnooc.com.cn。

中图分类号: P631.8⁺11
计量
- 文章访问数: 274
- HTML全文浏览量: 138
- PDF下载量: 71
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-23
- 修回日期: 2023-03-15
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-31
- 刊出日期: 2023-03-24

Formation Anisotropy Characterization Method Based on Micro-Resistivity Imaging Logging

1.
Shanghai Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Shanghai, 200335, China
2.
Hangzhou Sumay Technology Corporation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310012, China

摘要

摘要:
各向异性是地层固有的属性，在大斜度井、水平井中，可利用随钻电磁波测井曲线的差异信息进行各向异性系数计算；在井斜角较小的井中，各向异性对电阻率的影响较小，利用差异信息来计算地层各向异性系数的方法不再适用。为此，利用微电阻率成像测井的高分辨率特征和不同方位局部测量特性来划分图像灰度等级，并建立等效电阻率体积模型，进一步计算等效水平电阻率和垂直电阻率，从而获得储层的各向异性系数。与实钻井随钻电阻率计算的各向异性系数对比，一致性好，并且微电阻率成像计算的各向异性系数分辨率更高，能够很好地反映裂缝、孔洞、非均质井段的各向异性特征，为评价地层的各向异性提供新手段。
- 微电阻率成像 /
- 随钻测井 /
- 各向异性 /
- 校正 /
- 灰度等级
Abstract:
Anisotropy is an inherent property of the formation. In highly deviated wells and horizontal wells, the anisotropy coefficient can be calculated by using the difference information of electromagnetic wave logging curves while drilling. In slightly deviated wells, anisotropy has no obvious influence on resistivity. The traditional method of calculating formation anisotropy coefficients by using difference information is no longer applicable. In this paper, the high-resolution characteristics of micro-resistivity imaging logging and local measurement characteristics in different directions were used to divide the image gray scale, and the equivalent resistivity volume model was established to further calculate the equivalent horizontal resistivity and vertical resistivity, so as to obtain the anisotropy coefficient of the reservoir. The obtained anisotropy coefficient was compared with the anisotropy coefficient calculated with the resistivity while drilling of drilled wells, and the two were in good agreement. In addition, the resolution of the anisotropy coefficient calculated by the micro-resistivity imaging was higher, which could well reflect the anisotropy characteristics of fractures, holes, and heterogeneous well sections, and provide a new method for evaluating the formation anisotropy.
- micro-resistivity imaging /
- logging while drilling /
- anisotropy /
- correction /
- gray scale

HTML全文

图 1 ARC675型随钻电阻率测井仪示意

Figure 1. ARC675 instrument for resistivity logging while drilling

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 井眼与地层不同夹角下随钻电阻率测井的响应特征

Figure 2. Response characteristics of resistivity logging while drilling with different included angle between formation and borehole

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 A井微电阻率成像各向异性表征

Figure 3. Anisotropy characterization of micro-resistivity image of Well A

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 B井各向异性系数对比

Figure 4. Anisotropy coefficient comparison of Well B

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 一致性条件下的各向异性系数对比

Figure 5. Comparison of anisotropic coefficient under consistency condition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(18)

[1]	SUN Keli, OMERAGIC D, MINH C C, et al. Evaluation of resistivity anisotropy and formation dip from directional electromagnetic tools while drilling[R]. SPWLA-2010-26011, 2010.
[2]	李潮流,袁超,李霞,等. 致密砂岩电学各向异性测井评价与声电各向异性一致性分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2020,47(2):427–434. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.22 LI Chaoliu, YUAN Chao, LI Xia, et al. Anisotropy interpretation and the coherence research between resistivity and acoustic anisotropy in tight sands[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 427–434. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.22
[3]	夏宏泉,刘畅,李高仁,等. 基于测井资料的TIV地层水平地应力计算方法[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019,47(6):67–72. XIA Hongquan, LIU Chang, LI Gaoren, et al. A logging data-based calculation method for the horizontal TIV formation in-situ stress[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(6): 67–72.
[4]	BITTAR M S, HU Guoyu. The effects of rock anisotropy on LWD toroidal resistivity sensors[R]. SPWLA-2004-WW, 2004.
[5]	刘云鹤,殷长春,蔡晶,等. 电磁勘探中各向异性研究现状和展望[J]. 地球物理学报,2018,61(8):3468–3487. LIU Yunhe, YIN Changchun, CAI Jing, et al. Review on research of electrical anisotropy in electromagnetic prospecting[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 61(8): 3468–3487.
[6]	王磊,范宜仁,黄瑞,等. 各向异性介质多分量感应测井三维Born几何因子理论研究?[J]. 物理学报,2015,64(23):239301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.239301 WANG Lei, FAN Yiren, HUANG Rui, et al. Three dimensional Born geometrical factor of multi-component induction logging in anisotropic media[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23): 239301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.239301
[7]	岳喜洲,马明学,李国玉. 随钻电磁波电阻率测井曲线分离关系研究[J]. 石油管材与仪器,2016,2(2):53–56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9134.2016.02.013 YUE Xizhou, MA Mingxue, LI Guoyu. Study on relationships of the separated curves in resistivity logging while drilling[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2016, 2(2): 53–56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9134.2016.02.013
[8]	刘天淋,岳喜洲,李国玉,等. 超深探测随钻电磁波测井地质信号特性研究[J]. 石油钻探技术,2022,50(6):41–48. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2022110 LIU Tianlin, YUE Xizhou, LI Guoyu, et al. Study over the geo-signal properties of ultra-deep electromagnetic wave logging while drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(6): 41–48. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2022110
[9]	YOON D, ZHDANOV M S, MATTSSON J, et al. A hybrid finite-difference and integral-equation method for modeling and inversion of marine controlled-source electromagnetic data[J]. Geophysics, 2016, 81(5): E323–E336. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0513.1
[10]	翟金海, 聂在平, 孙向阳, 等. 油基泥浆微电阻率扫描测井方法建模及仿真[J]. 电波科学学报, 2011, 26（增刊1）: 311−313. ZHAI Jinhai, NIE Zaiping, SUN Xiangyang, et al. Modeling and simulation for oil-based mud logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2011, 26(supplement 1): 311−313.
[11]	路保平,丁士东,何龙,等. 低渗透油气藏高效开发钻完井技术研究主要进展[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019,47(1):1–7. LU Baoping, DING Shidong, HE Long, et al. Key achievement of drilling & completion technologies for the efficient development of low permeability oil and gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(1): 1–7.
[12]	郭书生,高永德,曲长伟,等. 南海西部乌石凹陷流沙港组二段储层精细表征[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(2):39–50. doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.02.005 GUO Shusheng, GAO Yongde, QU Changwei, et al. Fine characterization of the second member of Liushagang Formation in Wushi Sag, western South China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(2): 39–50. doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.02.005
[13]	胡松,王晓畅,孔强夫. 水平井随钻电磁波电阻率数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程,2017,17(14):59–66. HU Song, WANG Xiaochang, KONG Qiangfu. Numerical simulation of LWD resistivity in horizontal wells[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(14): 59–66.
[14]	李飞虎,张中庆,王卓远. 用矢量棱边元素法模拟三维感应测井响应[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版),2009,48(5):560–566. LI Feihu, ZHANG Zhongqing, WANG Zhuoyuan. Application of the vector finite element method to 3-D induction well logging problems[J]. Journal of Fudan University(Natural Science), 2009, 48(5): 560–566.
[15]	黄明泉,杨震. 随钻超深电磁波仪器探测深度及响应特征模拟[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(1):114–119. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019132 HUANG Mingquan, YANG Zhen. Simulation to determine depth of detection and response characteristics while drilling of an ultra-deep electromagnetic wave instrument[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(1): 114–119. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019132
[16]	乐友喜,陈艺都,吴佳伟,等. 自适应整形正则化迭代最小二乘谱反演方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(3):54–61. LE Youxi, CHEN Yidu, WU Jiawei, et al. Iterative least squares spectrum inversion based on adaptive shaping regularization[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2022, 46(3): 54–61.
[17]	范宜仁,吴易智,李潮流,等. 斜井各向异性地层阵列侧向测井资料快速分级反演方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):65–74. FAN Yiren, WU Yizhi, LI Chaoliu, et al. Fast hierarchical inversion for array lateral logging data of anisotropic formation in deviated well[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(3): 65–74.
[18]	张中庆,穆林雪,张雪,等. 矢量有限元素法在随钻电阻率测井模拟中的应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(4):64–71. ZHANG Zhongqing, MU Linxue, ZHANG Xue, et al. Application of vector finite element method to simulate logging-while-drilling resistivity tools[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2011, 35(4): 64–71.

施引文献(2)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	李永康, 张紫檀, 张卫卫, 王鹏, 刘晋伟, 郭慧. 胜利油田长效扩张式分层注水技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(04): 100-105 . 本站查看
2.	黎伟, 夏杨, 陈曦. RFID智能滑套设计与试验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2019(06): 83-88 . 本站查看