杨春和,王磊,曾义金,等. 考虑多因素的固井二界面胶结抗拉强度室内评价方法[J]. 石油钻探技术,2023, 51(4):48-54. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023041
引用本文: 杨春和,王磊,曾义金,等. 考虑多因素的固井二界面胶结抗拉强度室内评价方法[J]. 石油钻探技术,2023, 51(4):48-54. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023041
YANG Chunhe, WANG Lei, ZENG Yijin, et al. A laboratory method for evaluating the bonding tensile strength of the cement–formation interface considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2023, 51(4):48-54. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023041
Citation: YANG Chunhe, WANG Lei, ZENG Yijin, et al. A laboratory method for evaluating the bonding tensile strength of the cement–formation interface considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2023, 51(4):48-54. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2023041

考虑多因素的固井二界面胶结抗拉强度室内评价方法

A Laboratory Method for Evaluating the Bonding Tensile Strength of the Cement–Formation Interface Considering Multiple Factors

  • 摘要: 受井壁表面粗糙度、钻井液残留和温压扰动等因素的影响,固井二界面是整个环空封隔的最薄弱环节,且极易发生张拉破坏导致环空密封失效,但已有的评价方法只能获得固井二界面的胶结剪切强度,不能很好地评价固井二界面抗拉破裂性能。为此,考虑岩性、界面粗糙度、钻井液残留、冲洗液清洗和水泥浆等主要因素,建立了一种固井二界面胶结抗拉强度室内评价方法,从冲洗效率、胶结细观结构、抗拉强度、破裂形貌等多个维度对固井二界面胶结抗拉性能进行了系统评价。研究结果表明,该评价方法科学合理、步骤清晰、简单适用、试验结果离散性小,不同因素下测试结果区分度好,进一步完善了固井二界面胶结强度评价方法,具有较高的推广应用价值。

     

    Abstract: Due to the influence of surface roughness of wellbore walls, residual drilling fluids, and temperature perturbation, the cement–formation interface is the weakest link in the whole annulus sealing system. Additionally, tensile fracture is prone to occur and can lead to annulus sealing failure. The existing evaluation methods, however, can only determine the bonding shear strength of the cement–formation interface and cannot adequately evaluate its bonding tensile property. Therefore, a laboratory method was established to evaluate the bonding tensile strength of the cement–formation interface. This method took into consideration the main factors such as lithology, interface roughness, drilling fluid deposit, flushing fluid washing, and cement slurry. It systematically evaluated the bonding tensile strength of the cement–formation interface from multiple perspectives, including the flushing efficiency, the mesoscopic structure of bonding, tensile strength, and fracture morphology. Results from the research suggest that the proposed method is scientific and reasonable, and it reveals clear steps, simple application, and small discreteness of test results, and the test results are discriminative under different factors. Hence, the method improves the evaluation method for the bonding strength of the cement–formation interface and merits dissemination.

     

/

返回文章
返回