Analysis of Sensitive Factors in Dual Laterologs for Cavernous/Karst Formations Near the Borehole
-
摘要:
洞穴、裂缝及缝洞组合体是火成岩、碳酸盐岩储层的重要存储空间，具有各向异性明显、非均质性极强的特点，测井识别及定量评价难度大。为了给洞穴型地层测井识别与评价提供理论依据，基于有限元法，采用数值模拟方法分析了井径、钻井液电阻率、基岩电阻率、洞穴半径、洞穴填充物及洞穴与井壁的距离等因素对双侧向测井响应的影响。结果表明：在近井眼洞穴型地层中，由于洞穴的存在使双侧向电阻率明显减小，且随着洞穴半径增大，双侧向电阻率的减小幅度也增大；洞穴中心处的双侧向电阻率最小，随着洞穴半径增大，深、浅侧向电阻率都减小；双侧向电阻率随着洞穴与井壁的距离增大而增大，且浅侧向电阻率的增大程度明显高于深侧向电阻率。研究结果可为洞穴型地层双侧向测井资料的解释提供理论指导。
Abstract:Igneous and carbonate reservoirs consist of formations characterized by containing extensive fractures, caverns (karst), and fractured karst. The challenges exist in the fact that there is obvious anisotropy and strong heterogeneity, resulting in huge difficulty in logging identification and quantitative evaluation. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the logging identification and evaluation of karst/cavernous formations, the numerical analysis has been used to analyze the effects of hole diameter, drilling fluid resistivity, matrix resistivity, cave size, cave fillings. Further, the distance between cave and borehole is calculated based on the response of dual laterolog using the finite element method. The results showed that the dual laterolog resistivity was significantly reduced due to the existence of near-borehole cave formation. With an increase of cave size, the reduced amplitude of dual laterolog resistivity could be increased as well. The dual laterolog resistivity is the smallest at the center of cave, and as the cave radius increases, both the deep and shallow lateral resistivity decrease. The dual laterolog resistivity increases with the increase of distance between the cave and the well wall, and the increase rate of shallow lateral resistivity is significantly faster than that of deep lateral resistivity. The research results can provide theoretical guidance for the interpretation of dual laterolog data in cavernous/karst formation.
-
-
![]()
图 2 不同井径下近井眼洞穴型地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 2. Dual laterolog resistivity of near-borehole cave formation under different hole diameters
![]()
图 3 不同钻井液电阻率下近井眼洞穴型地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 3. Dual laterolog resistivity of near-borehole karst formation under different drilling fluid resistivities
![]()
图 4 不同基岩电阻率下洞穴型地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 4. Dual laterolog resistivity of karst formation under different matrix resistivities
![]()
图 5 基岩电阻率对双侧向测井电阻率与基岩电阻率比值的影响
Figure 5. Effect of matrix resistivity on the ratio of dual laterolog resistivity to matrix resistivity
![]()
图 6 不同洞穴半径下近井眼洞穴地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 6. Dual laterolog resistivity of near-borehole karst formation with different cave radii
![]()
图 7 不同洞穴填充物下近井眼洞穴地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 7. Dual laterolog resistivity of near-borehole karst formation with different cave fillings
![]()
图 8 不同洞穴与井壁的距离下近井眼洞穴地层双侧向电阻率
Figure 8. Dual laterolog resistivity of near-borehole karst formation under different karst boundary and distance from borehole wall
-
[1] 曾义金. 海相碳酸盐岩超深油气井安全高效钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(3): 25–33. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019062 ZENG Yijin. Key technologies for safe and efficient drilling of marine carbonate ultra-deep oil and gas wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 25–33. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019062
[2] 谢关宝. 双侧向测井响应特征分析及环境校正方法[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(20): 74–78. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.20.012 XIE Guanbao. Analysis of dual laterolog response characteristics and environmental correction[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2014, 32(20): 74–78. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.20.012
[3] 王晓畅,胡松,孔强夫. 双侧向测井响应计算洞穴充填物电阻率方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(3): 1155–1160. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0322 WANG Xiaochang, HU Song, KONG Qiangfu. Method of cave fillings resistivity calculation by dual laterolog response[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(3): 1155–1160. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0322
[4] 袁瑞. 塔河油田复杂碎屑岩岩性识别方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2014, 42(6): 64–67. YUAN Rui. Method to identify complicated lithology of clastic rocks in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42(6): 64–67.
[5] 范宜仁,王磊,李虎,等. 洞穴型地层双侧向测井响应数值模拟与特征分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(6): 40–46. FAN Yiren, WANG Lei, LI Hu, et al. Numerical simulation and corresponding characteristic analysis of dual laterolog for cave reservoirs[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(6): 40–46.
[6] 范宜仁,王磊,葛新民,等. 洞穴型地层双侧向测井响应模拟与特征分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2): 237–243. FAN Yiren, WANG Lei, GE Xinmin, et al. Response simulation and corresponding analysis of dual laterolog in cavernous reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 237–243.
[7] 王晓畅,李军,张松扬,等. 裂缝孔隙参数定量表征和刻度及影响因素分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(4): 1393–1399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.04.034 WANG Xiaochang, LI Jun, ZHANG Songyang, et al. Quantitative characterization and calibration of fracture pore parameters and the effect factors analysis[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2011, 26(4): 1393–1399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.04.034
[8] 刘玺,张珊珊. 过井眼缝洞地层双侧向电阻率测井敏感性因素分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 15(23): 31–35. LIU Xi, ZHANG Shanshan. The analysis on sensitivity of dual lateral resistivity logging for fracture-cavernous formation through the wellbore[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 15(23): 31–35.
[9] 倪小威,徐观佑,敖旋峰,等. 阵列侧向测井曲线极化角影响因素研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(2): 120–126. NI Xiaowei, XU Guanyou, AO Xuanfeng, et al. The influencing factors on the polarizing angle of array laterolog curves[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(2): 120–126.
[10] 李铭宇,柯式镇,康正明,等. 螺绕环激励式随钻侧向测井仪测量强度影响因素及响应特性[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(1): 128–134. LI Mingyu, KE Shizhen, KANG Zhengming, et al. Influence factors of measured signal intensity and the response characteristics of the toroidal coil excitation LWD laterolog instrument[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(1): 128–134.
[11] 倪小威,徐思慧,别康,等. 不同井眼偏心距下水平井阵列侧向测井围岩校正研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(4): 121–126. NI Xiaowei, XU Sihui, BIE Kang, et al. Surrounding rock influence correction for array laterolog responses with borehole eccentricities in horizontal wells[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(4): 121–126.
[12] TAN Maojin, GAO Jie, WANG Xiaochang, et al. Numerical simulation of the dual laterolog for carbonate cave reservoirs and response characteristics[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2011, 8(1): 79–85. doi: 10.1007/s11770-011-0268-2
[13] 冯进,倪小威,杨清,等. 基于混合模拟退火算法的阵列侧向测井实时反演研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(5): 121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019107 FENG Jin, NI Xiaowei, YANG Qing, et al. Research on array lateral logging real-time inversions based on hybrid simulated annealing algorithms[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(5): 121–126. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2019107
[14] 苏俊磊,张松扬,王晓畅,等. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩洞穴型储层充填性质常规测井表征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(3): 1264–1269. doi: 10.6038/pg20150336 SU Junlei, ZHANG Songyang, WANG Xiaochang, et al. Conventional logging characterization on fillings characteristic of cavernous carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(3): 1264–1269. doi: 10.6038/pg20150336
[15] 王晓畅,张军,李军,等. 基于交会图决策树的缝洞体类型常规测井识别方法:以塔河油田奥陶系为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(4): 805–812. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170417 WANG Xiaochang, ZHANG Jun, LI Jun, et al. Conventional logging identification of fracture-vug complex types data based on crossplots-decision tree: a case study from the ordovician in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(4): 805–812. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170417
-
期刊类型引用(2)
1. 李永康, 张紫檀, 张卫卫, 王鹏, 刘晋伟, 郭慧. 胜利油田长效扩张式分层注水技术. 石油钻探技术. 2020(04): 100-105 . 
本站查看
2. 黎伟, 夏杨, 陈曦. RFID智能滑套设计与试验研究. 石油钻探技术. 2019(06): 83-88 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(0)
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1004
- HTML全文浏览量: 306
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 2
