A Logging Data-Based Calculation Method for the Horizontal TIV Formation In-Situ Stress
-
摘要:
低孔低渗地层常具有TIV各向异性特征，准确计算水平地应力对该类储层的射孔和压裂设计至关重要。为了更加准确地计算TIV地层的水平地应力，针对该类地层的低压特征，优选Bowers法求取地层孔隙压力，然后利用阵列声波测井资料求取TIV地层的岩石力学参数（垂直与水平方向上的杨氏弹性模量和泊松比）；同时考虑层理面产状对水平地应力的影响，改进了传统的Sn模型，建立了TIV地层水平地应力新计算模型。用新模型计算了鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长6、长7和长8段TIV地层的水平地应力，计算结果与实测最大、最小水平地应力的最大相对误差分别为8.70%和7.86%，低于Sn模型的相对误差。研究结果表明，新模型计算的水平地应力更符合实际地应力纵横向分布的变化规律，可为致密油储层的水力压裂设计提供更可靠的参考依据。
Abstract:Given the TIV anisotropy characteristics of low porosity/permeability formations, the accurate calculation of horizontal in-situ stress is essential for the perforation and fracturing designs of those reservoirs. In order to more accurately and effectively calculate the horizontal in-situ stress of a TIV formation, considering the low-pressure characteristics of such formation, the Bowers method was used to obtain the formation pore pressure. Then, the array acoustic logging data was used to obtain the anisotropic rock mechanical parameters (the vertical/ horizontal Young’s modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio) of TIV formation. Considering the influence of bedding plane occurrence on horizontal in-situ stress, the traditional Sn model was improved and a new calculation model for the horizontal in-situ stress of TIV formation was established. The horizontal in-situ stresses of the TIV formations in the Chang 6, Chang 7 and Chang 8 sections of the Heshui area of the Ordos Basin were calculated by this new model. The maximum relative errors between the calculated and the measured maximum/minimum horizontal in-situ stresses were 8.70% and 7.86%, respectively, which were smaller than those of in-situ stresses calculated by Sn model. The results showed that the horizontal in-situ stress calculated by this new model was more in line with the variation laws of the vertical and horizontal distributions of the actual in-situ stress, which could provide a more reliable reference for the hydraulic fracturing design of tight oil reservoirs.
-
-
![]()
图 1 倾斜层理面或层界面发育的地层与大地坐标系、层状坐标系的关系
Figure 1. Relationship between the strata developed with tilted bedding or layer interface and the geodetic coordinate system and layered coordinate system
![]()
图 2 倾斜层状地层的地应力分量转换关系
Figure 2. The conversion relationship for the in-situ stress components of tilted bedded stratum
![]()
图 3 最大水平地应力与最小水平地应力的关系
Figure 3. The relationship between the maximum and minimum horizontal in-situ stresses
![]()
图 4 N148井1 630.00～1 790.00 m井段各向异性岩石力学参数和水平地应力测井综合解释图
Figure 4. Comprehensive logging interpretation map of anisotropic rock mechanical parameters and horizontal in-situ stress at an interval of 1 630.00–1 790.00 m in Well N148
表 1 最大、最小水平地应力实测值与模型计算值的对比
Table 1 Comparison of the measured and calculated values of the maximum/minimum horizontal in-situ stresses
井深/m 最大水平地应力/MPa 最大水平地应力相对误差，% 最小水平地应力/MPa 最小水平地应力相对误差，% 实测 新模型 Sn模型 新模型 Sn模型 实测 新模型 Sn模型 新模型 Sn模型 1 637.00 30.14 32.64 32.61 8.28 9.09 23.88 25.10 20.02 5.11 16.16 1 664.00 36.04 37.06 36.20 2.84 0.44 29.12 28.51 22.31 2.09 23.39 1 676.40 37.89 38.68 32.78 2.08 13.49 31.02 29.76 19.61 4.08 36.78 1 708.90 37.23 40.17 37.87 7.91 1.72 31.01 30.90 23.75 0.35 23.41 1 719.50 38.74 41.35 35.32 6.75 8.83 32.70 33.08 20.62 1.16 36.94 1 720.60 34.10 37.06 35.78 8.70 4.93 27.10 29.23 21.54 7.86 20.52 1 780.90 40.48 41.28 36.72 1.97 9.29 30.58 31.75 20.21 3.83 33.91 1 787.00 33.89 35.78 44.78 5.55 32.13 25.72 27.52 27.49 7.00 6.88 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 黄鑫,董秀成,肖春跃,等. 非常规油气勘探开发现状及发展前景[J]. 天然气与石油, 2012, 30(6): 38–41. HUANG Xin, DONG Xiucheng, XIAO Chunyue, et al. Present situation and development prospect of unconventional oil and gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2012, 30(6): 38–41.
[2] 王越之,李自俊. 横向各向同性地层地应力的研究[J]. 石油学报, 1999, 34(1): 34–37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.1999.01.007 WANG Yuezhi, LI Zijun. A study of in-situ stress in transversely isotropic formations[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1999, 34(1): 34–37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.1999.01.007
[3] WATERS G A, HEINZE J R, JACKSON R, et al. Use of horizontal well image tools to optimize Barnett shale reservoir exploitation[R]. SPE103202, 2006.
[4] 姜梦奇．横向各向同性介质克希霍夫叠前深度偏移方法研究[D]．青岛: 中国石油大学（华东）, 2016． JIANG Mengqi. Study on Kirchhoff pre-stack depth migration method for transversely isotropic media[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2016.
[5] 赵向原,曾联波,王晓东,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地宁县—合水地区长6、长7、长8储层裂缝差异性及开发意义[J]. 地质科学, 2015, 50(1): 274–285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2015.01.018 ZHAO Xiangyuan, ZENG Lianbo, WANG Xiaodong, et al. Differences of natural fracture characteristics and their development significance in Chang 6, Chang 7 and Chang 8 reservoir, Ningxian-Heshui area, Ordos Basin[J]. Scientia Geological Sinica, 2015, 50(1): 274–285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2015.01.018
[6] 刘忠华,宋连腾,王长胜,等. 各向异性快地层最小水平主应力测井计算方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5): 745–752. LIU Zhonghua, SONG Lianteng, WANG Changsheng, et al. Evaluation method of the least horizontal principal stress by logging data in anisotropic fast formations[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5): 745–752.
[7] 黄荣樽,庄锦江. 一种新的地层破裂压力预测方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 1986, 8(3): 1–14. HUANG Rongzun, ZHUANG Jinjiang. A new method for predicting formation fracture pressure[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 1986, 8(3): 1–14.
[8] HIGGINS S M, GOODWIN S A, DONALD A, et al. Anisotropic stress models improve completion design in the Baxter Shale[R]. SPE 115736, 2008.
[9] 刘方,陈剑军. 地质统计学反演预测地层压力的方法[J]. 工业技术创新, 2015, 2(3): 366–369. LIU Fang, CHEN Jianjun. Formation pressure prediction with geostatistical inversion[J]. Industrial Technology Innovation, 2015, 2(3): 366–369.
[10] 杨振平,吴波,王勇. Eaton法预测M油田地层孔隙压力[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(9): 181–182. YANG Zhenping, WU Bo, WANG Yong. Application of Eaton method in predicting the formation pore pressure of M Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012, 34(9): 181–182.
[11] BOWERS G L. Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 1995, 10(2): 89–95.
[12] 徐志星. 西湖凹陷异常地层压力特征及其与油气成藏的关系[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2015. XU Zhixing. Abnormal formation pressure and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in Xihu Sag[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2015.
[13] 夏宏泉,么勃卫,毕刚. 塔里木盆地致密砂岩气层异常高压的测井计算方法[J]. 测井技术, 2018, 42(4): 423–426. XIA Hongquan, YAO Bowei, BI Gang. Logging calculate method of abnormal high pressure in tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2018, 42(4): 423–426.
[14] WANG Zhijing. Seismic anisotropy in sedimentary rocks, part 1: a single-plug laboratory method[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(5): 1415–1422. doi: 10.1190/1.1512787
[15] SAROUT J, MOLEZ L, GUEGUEN Y, et al. Shale dynamic pro-perties and anisotropy under triaxial loading: experimental and theoretical investigations[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2007, 32(8–14): 896–906. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2006.01.007
[16] SUAREZ-RIVERA R, DEENADAYALU C, YANG Y K. Unlock-ing the unconventional oil and gas reservoirs: the effect of laminated heterogeneity in wellbore stability and completion of light gas shale reservoirs[R]. OTC 20269, 2009.
-
期刊类型引用(22)
1. 姜志生，徐慧，何岩峰，刘楠楠，陈尚平，史幸，魏文基，陈晟. 多元热流体开发稠油出砂机理及规律（英文）. 常州大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 48-60 . 
百度学术
2. 徐珂，刘敬寿，张辉，张冠杰，张滨鑫，王海应，张禹，来姝君，钱子维，强剑力. 复杂构造区全层系地质力学建模及其地质与工程应用. 地学前缘. 2024(05): 195-208 . 百度学术
3. 董长银，李经纬，周博，黄亮，刘亚宾，李强，黄有艺. 出砂气藏井底防砂筛管冲蚀动态模拟试验及冲蚀损坏工况评价方法. 安全与环境学报. 2023(06): 1859-1867 . 百度学术
4. 韩超，黄凡，职文栋，但顺华，万文胜，王琛. 基于核磁共振技术的疏松砂岩油藏微粒运移伤害机理. 科学技术与工程. 2023(20): 8621-8633 . 百度学术
5. 李敬彬，程康，胡静茹，黄中伟，王海柱. 水力喷射径向水平井回灌增注特性可视化试验研究. 流体机械. 2023(11): 1-8 . 百度学术
6. 鹿晓涵，侯满福，黄国辉，王永军，杨爱英，胡围焱. BQ地区东营组疏松砂岩试油测试压差确定方法. 油气井测试. 2023(06): 8-12 . 百度学术
7. 赵衍彬. 利用数字岩心方法评价稠油开采方式对渗透率的影响研究. 精细石油化工. 2022(01): 45-49 . 百度学术
8. Chang-Yin Dong，Bo Zhou，Fan-Sheng Huang，Lei Zhang，Yi-Zhong Zhao，Yang Song，Jun-Yu Deng. Microscopic sand production simulation and visual sanding pattern description in weakly consolidated sandstone reservoirs. Petroleum Science. 2022(01): 279-295 . 必应学术
9. 孙帅帅，赵成龙，王瑞祥，张启龙，石磊. 渤海XX油田防砂控水完井设计研究及案例分析. 科学技术创新. 2022(12): 177-180 . 百度学术
10. 董长银，陈琛，周博，隋义勇，王兴，王金忠. 油气藏型储气库出砂机理及防砂技术现状与发展趋势展望. 石油钻采工艺. 2022(01): 43-55 . 百度学术
11. 张启龙，韩耀图，龚宁，李进，陈卓. 基于LS-SVM的渤海油田防砂设计优化方法研究. 石油机械. 2021(01): 110-117 . 百度学术
12. 林海，张晓诚，谢涛，庹海洋，刘海龙，孙金. 基于断层稳定性的疏松砂岩临界注水压力研究. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 29-33+49 . 百度学术
13. 孙珂，陈清华，徐珂，孙建芳. 油水比例变化对岩石力学性质的影响及出砂分析——以金湖凹陷秦营断块区阜宁组储层为例. 中国矿业大学学报. 2021(05): 909-922 . 百度学术
14. 董长银，闫切海，周博，王宇宾，邓君宇，宋洋，王力智. 弱胶结储层微观出砂形态与出砂机理可视化实验模拟研究. 石油钻采工艺. 2020(02): 227-235 . 百度学术
15. 徐珂，田军，杨海军，张辉，王志民，袁芳，王海应. 深层致密砂岩储层现今地应力场预测及应用——以塔里木盆地克拉苏构造带克深10气藏为例. 中国矿业大学学报. 2020(04): 708-720 . 百度学术
16. 李进，许杰，龚宁，韩耀图，高斌. 渤海油田疏松砂岩储层动态出砂预测. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(01): 119-128 . 百度学术
17. 徐珂，戴俊生，商琳，房璐，冯建伟，杜赫. 南堡凹陷现今地应力特征及影响因素. 中国矿业大学学报. 2019(03): 570-583 . 百度学术
18. 董长银，闫切海，李彦龙，徐鸿志，周玉刚，尚校森，陈强，宋洋. 天然气水合物储层颗粒级尺度微观出砂数值模拟. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 77-87 . 百度学术
19. REN Shaoran，LIU Yanmin，GONG Zhiwu，YUAN Yujie，YU Lu，WANG Yanyong，XU Yan，DENG Junyu. Numerical Simulation of Water and Sand Blowouts When Penetrating Through Shallow Water Flow Formations in Deep Water Drilling. Journal of Ocean University of China. 2018(01): 17-24 . 必应学术
20. 刘浩伽，李彦龙，刘昌岭，董长银，吴能友，孙建业. 水合物分解区地层砂粒启动运移临界流速计算模型. 海洋地质与第四纪地质. 2017(05): 166-173 . 百度学术
21. 董长银，周崇，钟奕昕，王鹏，崔明月，曾思睿，尚校森. 中等强度砂岩饱水力学参数变化试验及动态出砂规律. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(06): 108-116 . 百度学术
22. 陈欢庆，石成方，王珏，姚尧. 稠油热采储层精细油藏描述研究进展. 断块油气田. 2016(05): 549-553 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(15)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1183
- HTML全文浏览量: 554
- PDF下载量: 74
- 被引次数: 37
