Citation: | ZHANG Guodong, LU Fawei, CHEN Bo, LUO Jian, HU Wenliang, HE Yuchun. A Fluid Properties while Drilling Rapid Identification Method under Oil-Based Drilling Fluid Conditions for Low Porosity and Low Permeability Reservoirs in the Xihu Sag[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(5): 116-120. DOI: 10.11911/syztjs.2019100 |
In order to achieve rapid identification while drilling of fluid properties for low porosity and low permeability reservoirs in the Xihu Sag under oil-based drilling fluid conditions, a delay-resistivity logging comparison identification method was proposed. The fluid loss test of oil-based drilling fluid was carried out, and its fluid loss characteristics in the low porosity and low permeability reservoirs were studied. The characteristics of resistivity change after the drilling fluid filtrate intruded into the different depths and types of formations during the resistivity LWD under oil-based drilling fluid conditions were analyzed. The study found that there was a certain fluid loss in the oil-based drilling fluid, and the amount of fluid loss showed a certain relationship with in-situ physical properties, along with pressure difference and time. The oil-based drilling fluid filtrate was not conductive, and if it invaded the reservoir, and the oil and gas were displaced, the resistivity of LWD and re-tested one were basically the same. If the formation water was displaced, the re-tested resistivity increased, and it could be greater than the resistivity of LWD. Therefore, based on the high intrusion characteristics of oil-based drilling fluids, according to the time-lapse logging concept, a method was proposed to that could quickly identify the fluid properties by comparing the difference between the shallow real-time resistivity and the re-tested resistivity. This method was successfully applied in the field, and the obtained fluid properties rapid identification results were consistent with the results of subsequent cable formation test pumping, indicating that this new technique was feasible and in addition, could potentially have widespread applications.
[1] |
张国华. 西湖凹陷高压形成机制及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 中国海上油气, 2013, 25(2): 1–7.
ZHANG Guohua. Origin mechanism of high formation pressure and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation in Xihu Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(2): 1–7.
|
[2] |
张国栋. 气测录井全量正演计算方法判别低孔低渗储层含气性[J]. 中国海上油气, 2017, 29(1): 46–51.
ZHANG Guodong. Gas bearing interpretation method for low porosity and low permeability reservoir with total gas forward calculation method of gas logging data[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(1): 46–51.
|
[3] |
张国栋, 庄春喜, 黑创. 东海西湖凹陷探井储层压后缝高评价新方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016, 44(5): 122–126.
ZHANG Guodong, ZHUANG Chunxi, HEI Chuang. New techniques for fracture height determination in exploration wells drilled in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(5): 122–126.
|
[4] |
郑小敏,成志刚,林伟川,等. 致密砂岩气藏启动压差与可动水变化规律实验研究[J]. 测井技术, 2014, 38(1): 33–38.
ZHENG Xiaomin, CHENG Zhigang, LIN Weichuan, et al. Change law experimental study on trigger pressure difference and mobile water in tight sand gas reservoir[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2014, 38(1): 33–38.
|
[5] |
李霞,赵文智,周灿灿,等. 低孔低渗碎屑岩储集层双孔隙饱和度模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 82–91.
LI Xia, ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHOU Cancan, et al. Dual-porosity saturation model of low-porosity and low-permeability clastic reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 82–91.
|
[6] |
王翠平.致密含气砂岩储层参数及可动流体的定量评价[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2013.
WANG Cuiping. Quantitative evaluation of reservoir parameters and movable fluid in tight gas sandstone[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.
|
[7] |
杨涛涛,王霞,何文昌. 低阻油气层成因及测井识别评价方法分析[J]. 油气地球物理, 2017, 15(4): 1–6.
YANG Taotao, WANG Xia, HE Wenchang. Analysis of genesis of low resistivity oil gas layer and its logging identification evaluation[J]. Petroleum Geophysics, 2017, 15(4): 1–6.
|
[8] |
叶礼友,高树生,杨洪志,等. 致密砂岩气藏产水机理与开发对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(2): 41–46. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.02.006
YE Liyou, GAO Shusheng, YANG Hongzhi, et al. Water production mechanism and development strategy of tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(2): 41–46. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.02.006
|
[9] |
张旭,姜瑞忠,崔永正,等. 考虑束缚水时变的致密气藏数值模拟研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2017, 29(5): 82–89.
ZHANG Xu, JIANG Ruizhong, CUI Yongzheng, et al. Numerical simulation study on tight gas reservoir considering the variation of irreducible water saturation with time[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(5): 82–89.
|
[10] |
鹿克峰,徐振中,冯景林. 一种定量表征油水过渡区饱和度分布的实用方法[J]. 中国海上油气, 2011, 23(6): 387–390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2011.06.008
LU Kefeng, XU Zhenzhong, FENG Jinglin. A practical method to quantitatively characterize oil saturation distribution in oil-water transition zones[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2011, 23(6): 387–390. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2011.06.008
|
[11] |
陈福煊. 电阻率时间推移测井解释方法研究[J]. 天然气工业, 1996, 16(1): 25–28.
CHEN Fuxuan. Investigation on the interpretation method of resistivity time-lapse logging[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1996, 16(1): 25–28.
|
[12] |
孙建孟,张海涛,马建海,等. 用时间推移测井计算原始含水饱和度新方法研究[J]. 测井技术, 2003, 27(3): 217–220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2003.03.010
SUN Jianmeng, ZHANG Haitao, MA Jianhai, et al. On a new method for calculating in-situ water saturation with time-lapse logging[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2003, 27(3): 217–220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2003.03.010
|
[13] |
吴飞.低孔渗砂岩储层泥浆侵入模拟及侵入特征研究[D].青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
WU Fei. Imitation and characteristic analysis of mud filtrate invasion in low porous and low permeable sandstone reservoir[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (Huadong), 2015.
|